<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Picket Fence &#187; Trades</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/category/trades/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence</link>
	<description>A discussion about basketball.  More specifically the Raptors and the NBA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 19:00:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>2011 NBA Draft Report Card!</title>
		<link>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/06/2011-nba-draft-report-card/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/06/2011-nba-draft-report-card/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 07:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim W.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[76ers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blazers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobcats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cavs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celtics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clippers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grizzlies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hornets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jazz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mavericks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuggets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pistons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raptors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rockets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Wolves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thunder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warriors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wizards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/?p=1330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TORONTO: Exceeds Expectations 5. Jonas Valanciunas It&#8217;s deja vu all over again. Last year, a team above them unexpectedly took an athletic defensive power forward which resulted in a higher ranked big man unexpectedly falling to the Raptors. Colangelo and the Raptors brass probably can&#8217;t believe their luck. I was afraid they might still take Knight, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/boy_report_card_tough_spin_schoo_1188735.jpg" class="thickbox no_icon" rel="gallery-1330" title="boy_report_card_tough_spin_schoo_1188735"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1331" style="margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="boy_report_card_tough_spin_schoo_1188735" src="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/boy_report_card_tough_spin_schoo_1188735-300x214.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="214" /></a></p>
<p><strong>TORONTO: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>5. <strong>Jonas Valanciunas</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s deja vu all over again. Last year, a team above them unexpectedly took an athletic defensive power forward which resulted in a higher ranked big man unexpectedly falling to the Raptors. Colangelo and the Raptors brass probably can&#8217;t believe their luck. I was afraid they might still take Knight, but Colangelo showed he is indeed focused on the future, rather than the present.</p>
<p>Valanciunas will fill the void at center the Raptors have been lacking for, well, ever. While apparently a lot of Raptor fans are unhappy with the pick, I think they&#8217;ll eventually regret that as Valanciunas is the type of player that Raptor fans love. He&#8217;s a high energy player who hustles, defends and rebounds. English, though, is not his strong suit.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the pick they got from the Heat, which they traded to the Bulls for James Johnson, could have been used to pick Corey Joseph at 28, who went one spot later to the Spurs. Who knows if that&#8217;s who Colangelo would have picked, as he was projected to go in the second round, but I&#8217;ll certainly be comparing their careers. And since the Spurs are pretty much never wrong&#8230;</p>
<p>I would have liked to see them try and scoop up another pick, but it&#8217;s not a big deal that they didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p><strong>SAN ANTONIO: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>29. <strong>Cory Joseph</strong></p>
<p>Traded George Hill for Indiana&#8217;s 15th pick, <strong>Kawhi Leonard</strong>.</p>
<p>I assumed the Spurs would exceed expectations, and again they have. Trading for Leonard is huge, especially since he was projected to go in the top ten and dropped. He&#8217;s the type of defender than the Spurs love, is in the perfect situation, and should step in Bruce Bowen&#8217;s shoes, that have been empty for a few years.</p>
<p>If on of my sleepers, Toronto&#8217;s Cory Joseph couldn&#8217;t get drafted by the Raptors, then the Spurs would have been my second choice. And it&#8217;s incredible timing because they might have their replacement for Hill. Yes, he projected to go in the second round, but I think he has first round talent and so, apparently, do the Spurs.haunt them. Burks should be a decent player, but guys like him are a dime a dozen.</p>
<p><strong>CHARLOTTE: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>7. <strong>Bismack Biyombo</strong><br />
9. <strong>Kemba Walker </strong></p>
<p>Traded Stephen Jackson for Sacramento&#8217;s 7th pick and Corey Maggette.</p>
<p>Sold 39th pick, Jeremy Tyler to Golden State, I&#8217;m guessing for cash.</p>
<p>It hurts to say it, but Charlotte actually did well. I was surprised that they passed on Knight for Biyombo, as they&#8217;ve been looking for a real starting PG for, well, their entire existence, but they resisted temptation and went with a guy who I think will be better down the road. I also look forward to watching Biyombo and Tyrus Thomas being on the floor at the same time. The front row needs to watch out.</p>
<p>Maggette was a disaster in Milwaukee and now brings his brand of scoring and no defense to Charlotte. He&#8217;s probably going to lose games for them, but that&#8217;s kind of what they wanted, so maybe it&#8217;s a good thing?</p>
<p>Walker fell, but not as far as I thought he might. I think it&#8217;s still a pretty good pick at 9, but Charlotte seems to like picking decent PGs with little upside.</p>
<p><strong>CHICAGO: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>23. <strong>Nikola Mirotic</strong><br />
30. <strong>Jimmy Butler</strong></p>
<p>Traded 28th and 43rd picks for Houstons 23rd pick, Nikola Mirotic.</p>
<p>Butler was very efficient offensively at Butler, and is a very good defender, so the Bulls may have a sleeper on their hands.</p>
<p>How much do you think the Spurs are pissed at not getting Mirotic, who is exactly the type of player they usually scoop up at the end up the first round? He&#8217;s a huge steal, but will play overseas for a couple of more seasons. That&#8217;s fine with the Bulls.</p>
<p><strong>DENVER: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>22. <strong>Kenneth Faried</strong><br />
26. <strong>Jordan Hamilton<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">56. </span>Chukwudiebere Maduabum</strong></p>
<p>Traded Raymond Felton for Portland&#8217;s 26th pick, Jordan Hamilton, and Andre Miller.</p>
<p>Traded for Laker&#8217;s 56th pick, Chukwudiebere Maduabum, somehow.</p>
<p>Although I haven&#8217;t confirmed that Denver is, in fact, keeping Faried, if they do this was a very good draft day. I would have liked to have seen them get more for Felton, but Miller is a good, veteran PG that will probably be shipped elsewhere soon. Plus they were able to pick up another pick and a SF who has a chance to be a decent pro.</p>
<p>Faried is the type of player that everyone loves and helps you win. So why didn&#8217;t he go higher? Probably because he&#8217;s not a scorer and a little undersized.</p>
<p>I have no idea who Chukwudiebere Maduabum, but on his <a  href="http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Chu-Chu-Maduabum-6398/" target="_blank">Draft Express profile</a>, he&#8217;s listed as Chu Chu. I think he&#8217;s worthy of picking just for that. He immediately is in the running for best All-Tim NBA name.</p>
<p><strong>MEMPHIS: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>49. <strong>Josh Selby</strong></p>
<p>Selby was considered a first round talent, so this has to be considered a steal. Where they&#8217;ll find room for him, is another thing.<br />
<strong>DETROIT: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>8. <strong>Brandon Knight</strong><br />
33. <strong>Kyle Singler</strong><br />
52. <strong>Vernon Macklin</strong></p>
<p>Although I question whether he can play PG, Knight was projected to go in the top 5 and dropped to 8th, so Pistons fans have to be happy. Of course, he kind of presents the same problems that Rodney Stuckey, who&#8217;s also a combo guard they tried to turn into a point guard, did.</p>
<p>Singler is never going to be a star, but last year he was considered a middle first round pick and they got him in the second round. I think he&#8217;ll hang on and have a decent career as a bench player.</p>
<p><strong>DALLAS: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>Traded their 26th pick to Portland for Rudy Fernandez</p>
<p>The rich get richer. Dallas has no use for a rookie and no one picked there was going to help them like Fernandez. I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if he ends up starting next year.</p>
<p><strong>LAKERS: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>41.<strong> Darius Morris</strong><br />
46. <strong>Andrew Goodelock</strong><br />
58. <strong>Ater Majok</strong></p>
<p>Without a first round pick, they were able to pick up a decent prospect, in Darius Morris. This might be the second year in a row they get at least one keeper from the second round.</p>
<p><strong>PHILADELPHIA: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>16. <strong>Nikola Vucevic</strong><br />
50. <strong>Lavoy Allen</strong></p>
<p>Vucevic should end up being a pretty good pro and probable starter. At 16, in this draft, that&#8217;s pretty damn good.</p>
<p><strong>CLEVELAND: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Meets Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>1.<strong> Kyrie Irving</strong><br />
4. <strong>Tristan Thompson<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">32.</span> Justin Harper </strong></p>
<p>Irving will probably be the best player, so it was no surprise he was the first pick.</p>
<p>Thompson was the first big surprise of the night. And while I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a bad pick, since I think Thompson is going to be a very good pro, but he was a big reach at 3. Valanciunas would have made much more sense, but apparently Cleveland wants to make an impact immediately. Something they might regret down the line.</p>
<p>I think Cleveland should have offered Minnesota everything but it&#8217;s first pick to move up to 2 and draft Williams. If they had come out of the draft with Irving AND Williams, their future would have looked A LOT brighter.</p>
<p>Justin Harper is a stretch 4 that isn&#8217;t very big and probably won&#8217;t be much of a rebounder in the NBA. If he sticks, it&#8217;s because of his shooting. On Cleveland, that&#8217;s devoid of talent, he might, but with Antawn Jamison and J.J. Hickson as well as Anderson Varejao, who will probably be traded this summer, it&#8217;s puzzling why they&#8217;d take another power forward.</p>
<p><strong>NEW YORK: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Meets Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>45. <strong>Josh Harrellson</strong></p>
<p>New York gets the guy Enes Kanter apparently made into the player he is today. So says Harrellson.</p>
<p><strong>MINNESOTA:</strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong> Meets Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>2. <strong>Derrick Williams</strong></p>
<p>Traded Jonny Flynn for Houston&#8217;s 23rd pick, Nikola Mirotic, and Brad Miller.</p>
<p>For some reason the T-Wolves don&#8217;t end up with the 23d pick, so it&#8217;s basically a Flynn for Miller deal. Not sure why they&#8217;d do that.</p>
<p>Keeping Williams is the right move even though he doubles up on Beasley&#8217;s skills. He should be better than Bealsey and should give the Wolves some star power.</p>
<p><strong>UTAH: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Meets Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>3. <strong>Enes Kanter<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">12. </span>Alec Burks </strong></p>
<p>Although a lot of people had Brandon Knight going to Utah for the months leading up to the draft, they apparently changed their mind with less than a week to go. And while I was a little missed he didn&#8217;t fall to the Raptors, I think Utah will be VERY happy they chose Kanter instead of Knight.</p>
<p>Of course, while I think they made the right decision at 3, passing up Leonard, who is probably exactly what the Jazz need, is probably going to</p>
<p><strong>OKLAHOMA CITY: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Meets Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>27. <strong>Reggie Jackson</strong></p>
<p>Jackson is a combo guard who joins an already crowded Thunder backcourt. I really don&#8217;t know where he&#8217;ll find minutes. I wonder why Oklahoma didn&#8217;t simply trade out of the draft.</p>
<p><strong>PORTLAND: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Meets Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>21. <strong>Nolan Smith</strong><br />
51. <strong>Jon Diebler</strong></p>
<p>Traded Andre Miller for Raymond Felton</p>
<p>Traded Rudy Fernandez to Dallas for 26th pick, which they gave to Denver in prearranged deal.</p>
<p>Getting Felton for Miller is a great deal for Portland. He might be the young point guard they&#8217;ve been looking for all these years.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, picking Nolan Smith over Faried, who they could really use, was a mistake.</p>
<p><strong>ORLANDO: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Meets Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>53. <strong>DeAndre Liggins</strong></p>
<p>He&#8217;s a player that was on Kentucky, but now he&#8217;s not.</p>
<p><strong>ATLANTA: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Meets Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>48. <strong>Keith Benson</strong></p>
<p>He&#8217;s got legit size for an NBA power forward, and he&#8217;s stronger than he looks. For the 48th pick, the Hawks did well.</p>
<p>For a team hitting their ceiling, I would have liked to have seen them a little more active. Maybe after the new CBA is signed, whenever that happens.</p>
<p><strong>MIAMI: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Approaching Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>28. <strong>Norris Cole</strong></p>
<p>Somehow got the 28th pick from Chicago to draft Cole, a PG, who should provide insurance in case Bibby is not re-upped.</p>
<p><strong>BOSTON: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Approaching  Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>27. <strong>JuJuan Johnson<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">55. </span>E&#8217;Twaun Moore </strong></p>
<p>Traded their 25th pick for the 27th pick.</p>
<p>Johnson is a decent player, but I don&#8217;t see him making any impact on the Celtics, either now or down the line. But would anyone else have?</p>
<p>Moore is an undersized shooting guard, but I&#8217;m guessing what attracted Boston was the ability to tell people they drafted JuJuan and E&#8217;Twaun. And both are American.</p>
<p><strong>MILWAUKEE: </strong><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Approaching Expectations</span></strong></p>
<p>19. <strong>Tobias Harris</strong><br />
40. <strong>John Leuer</strong></p>
<p>Traded Corey Maggette and 10th pick for Stephen Jackson and Charlotte&#8217;s 19th pick, Tobias Harris.</p>
<p>Getting rid of Maggette, who was a disaster, is good, but is Jackson really what they need? And how much longer does he have? Harris is a good pick, though, who&#8217;s been compared to Shane Battier.</p>
<p><strong>PHOENIX: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Approaching  Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>13. <strong>Markieff Morris</strong></p>
<p>Morris might make a pretty good role player on a good team. Phoenix, however, needs home runs, not singles. They have a lot of role players and the engine that makes them go, Nash, is nearing the end of his career.</p>
<p><strong>GOLDEN STATE: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Approaching Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>11. <strong>Klay Thompson</strong><br />
37. <strong>Jeremy Tyler</strong><br />
44. <strong>Charles Jenkins</strong></p>
<p>So they STILL have Monta Ellis, yet decide to draft yet another shooter, while Kawhi Leonard  and Nikola Vucevic were still available. Thompson might be the best player available, for all I know, though, and if Jerry West thinks so, it&#8217;s probably true.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about Tyler, though, who seems to have the physical tools, but needs maturity.</p>
<p><strong>WASHINGTON: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Approaching Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>6. <strong>Jan Vesely</strong><br />
18.<strong>Chris Singleton<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">34. </span></strong><strong>Shelvin Mack </strong></p>
<p>A lot of teams seemed high on Vesley, but I don&#8217;t understand the attraction to him. He&#8217;s 6&#8217;11 and athletic, but he&#8217;s not a great scorer, can&#8217;t shoot, isn&#8217;t a good ball handler, will probably struggle defensively at the 3 and is a poor rebounder for his size. He&#8217;s apparently got a good motor, though, and he&#8217;s got a very hot girlfriend, so those are both pluses.</p>
<p>Singleton was on my don&#8217;t draft list and I really don&#8217;t see how he&#8217;s going to play with Vesley. Neither can shoot, but Singleton has even fewer skills than Vesley.</p>
<p><strong>NEW JERSEY: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Approaching Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>25. <strong>Marshon Brooks</strong><br />
36.<strong> Jordan Williams</strong></p>
<p>Traded their 27th pick, JaJuan Johnson for Boston&#8217;s 25th pick, Marshon Brooks</p>
<p>When I first saw a trade between Boston and New Jersey involving Brooks, I thought it was a blockbuster. No, it was not Brooks Lopez, but Marshon Brooks, who bring his great shooting and horrible defense to a bad defensive team.</p>
<p><strong>CLIPPERS: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Needs Improvement</strong></span></p>
<p>37. <strong>Trey Thompkins</strong><br />
47. <strong>Travis Leslie</strong></p>
<p>The Clippers traded away a unprotected lottery pick that ended up being Kyrie Irving, who&#8217;s probably just what the Clippers could have used to solidify them as one of the teams of the future. What they ended up drafting were two solid NCAA players with probably very little chance of sticking in the NBA.</p>
<p><strong>SACRAMENTO: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Needs Improvement</strong></span></p>
<p>10. <strong>Jimmer Fredette</strong><br />
35. <strong>Tyler Honeycutt</strong></p>
<p>Traded their 7th pick for Milwaukee&#8217;s 10th pick, Jimmer Fredette, and John Salmons</p>
<p>So, the Kings trade John Salmons away, only to trade back for him a couple of years later. And move down in the draft in order to do it. Fredette might be a great shooter, but I don&#8217;t see how he helps Sacramento. He&#8217;s not going to be a good defender and will do nothing for the chemistry. Keeping the pick and taking Knight or Walker would have been preferable.</p>
<p><strong>HOUSTON: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Needs Improvement</strong></span></p>
<p>14. <strong>Marcus Morris</strong><br />
38. <strong>Chandler Parsons</strong></p>
<p>Traded Brad Miller, the 23rd pick and a future first rounder for Minnesota&#8217;s 20th pick, <strong>Donatas Motiejunas</strong>, and Jonny Flynn.</p>
<p>Houston&#8217;s GM, Daryl Morey, intrigues me. He&#8217;s apparently a big advanced stats guy and was initially a guy a lot of Raptor fans wanted to replace Colangelo, but he makes the most head scratching trades. Motiejunas was another on my do not draft list. He doesn&#8217;t defend or rebound, but should be able to score a lot, which makes him basically a bigger version of Kevin Martin</p>
<p>Morris is, yet another young, decent power forward to join Houston&#8217;s stable of other decent, power forwards. Apparently you can never get enough of them.</p>
<p>Parsons is a typical Rocket small forward. he does a whole lot of things, but none of them really well.</p>
<p><strong>INDIANA: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Needs Improvement</strong></span></p>
<p>Traded their 15th pick, Kawhi Leonard, to the Spurs for George Hill</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t the Pacers already have enough PGs who aren&#8217;t really PGs? George Hill looked good in the Spurs system, but you need to watch out for those guys, because there&#8217;s a good chance he won&#8217;t look nearly as good out of it. And while the Pacers already have enough SFs, don&#8217;t they know not to trade a draft pick to the Spurs?</p>
<p><strong>NEW ORLEANS: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Incomplete</strong></span></p>
<p>Traded completely out of the draft by trading the 45th pick, Josh Harrellson, to the Knicks for cash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/06/2011-nba-draft-report-card/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could Parker Be A Raptor?</title>
		<link>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/06/could-parker-be-a-raptor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/06/could-parker-be-a-raptor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 05:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim W.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raptors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trades]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/?p=1315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So as we get closer to the draft, more and more rumours start floating around. We&#8217;ve seen Bogut being offered for the 2nd pick, and then Milwaukee denying it. We&#8217;ve seen Minnesota offer the Lakers the 2nd pick for Andrew Bynum. Then we say Indiana apparently offer Roy Hibbert and their 15th pick for the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So as we get closer to the draft, more and more rumours start floating around. We&#8217;ve seen Bogut being offered for the 2nd pick, and then Milwaukee denying it. We&#8217;ve seen Minnesota offer the Lakers the 2nd pick for <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/b/bynuman01.html" target="_blank">Andrew  Bynum</a>. Then we say Indiana apparently offer <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/h/hibbero01.html" target="_blank">Roy  Hibbert</a> and their 15th pick for the 2nd pick. If all these team are going after Derrick Williams, he better be a future All-Star.</p>
<p>The latest rumour, however, involves the Raptors, at least partly. San Antonio has apparently been offering lottery teams, including the Toronto Raptors, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/p/parketo01.html" target="_blank">Tony  Parker</a> in exchange for their pick.</p>
<p>On the surface, this seems like it could be a good deal for the Raptors. Parker is a former All-Star and Finals MVP who is only 29. He&#8217;s probably still got 4 or 5 years left of really high quality basketball, and most likely higher quality than what any of the potential draft picks would bring.</p>
<p>Then you think about it a little.</p>
<p>First of all, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/p/parketo01.html" target="_blank">Tony  Parker</a> is 29 years old, but it&#8217;s an old 29. He&#8217;s played 746 regular season games and 138 playoff games. That&#8217;s 884 games, not including preseason and playing for France, which he&#8217;s done a fair bit of.  That&#8217;s more games than anyone else in his draft class. A class which includes <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/gasolpa01.html" target="_blank">Pau  Gasol</a>, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/b/battish01.html" target="_blank">Shane  Battier</a>, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/j/johnsjo02.html" target="_blank">Joe  Johnson</a>, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/r/richaja01.html" target="_blank">Jason  Richardson</a> and <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/d/dalemsa01.html" target="_blank">Samuel  Dalembert</a>. So while he&#8217;s one of the younger players from his draft class, he&#8217;s also got one of the older bodies. And that could be a problem with the type of game he plays. He relies on quickness and at 6&#8217;1 and probably under 200 lbs, his body takes a lot of beating since the majority of his shots come in the paint. In a season and a half, he&#8217;ll have played more than 1000 games taking the kind of punishment he has.</p>
<p>And while one can point to <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/n/nashst01.html" target="_blank">Steve  Nash</a>, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/k/kiddja01.html" target="_blank">Jason  Kidd</a> and John Stockton as point guards who have played at a high level until their late 30&#8242;s, I can name you hundreds of other point guards who started breaking down before they even hit 30. And most of them hadn&#8217;t played nearly the number of games that Parker has.</p>
<p>Another issue is that while Parker would have an immediate impact on the team, it wouldn&#8217;t be best for the team, longterm. I understand the argument that a veteran presence would have a positive impact on the team. The problem with this argument, however, is that the Raptors are not nearly at the point in their development where a guy like Parker would really help them. The biggest problem is that Parker would immediately become the best player on the team. And while that may sound great, a team where <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/p/parketo01.html" target="_blank">Tony  Parker</a> is the only All-Star calibre player on the team is going to be a pretty mediocre team. Which means the ceiling of this team would be probably a first round exit. And just when guys like <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/d/derozde01.html" target="_blank">DeMar  DeRozan</a> and <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/d/davised01.html" target="_blank">Ed  Davis</a> start to come into their own is when Parker would start declining. In other words, you lose his talent just when you need it the most.</p>
<p>So while Parker still in HIS prime, the team might eventually become a .500 team, fighting for the 7th or 8th seed. And that&#8217;s probably best case scenario. And then when he starts to decline, DeRozan and Davis start to peak. And while they have the potential to be good players, they&#8217;ll never be elite players, so that team&#8217;s best case scenario is probably a 7th or 8th seed and team winning in the low 40&#8242;s. In other words, a trade for Parker would pretty much doom the team to mediocrity. And for a franchise that has seen too much mediocrity, that&#8217;s the last thing they need.</p>
<p>Last, and certainly not least, if the Spurs are willing to trade <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/p/parketo01.html" target="_blank">Tony  Parker</a> for a lottery pick, you have to figure that whoever they want is going to be a damn good player, since this is the Spurs we&#8217;re talking about. So instead of trading for Parker, I&#8217;d just try and figure out who they want to draft and take him. I&#8217;m betting he becomes the best player of this draft.</p>
<p>To me, that&#8217;s the smart thing to do.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p><a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/06/what-the-hell-is-with-this-draft/">Check out my draft preview</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/06/could-parker-be-a-raptor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The PG Conundrum &amp; Other NBA Stories</title>
		<link>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/06/the-pg-conundrum-other-nba-stories/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/06/the-pg-conundrum-other-nba-stories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim W.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[76ers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raptors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warriors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/?p=1299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another year in Raptorland, another summer of uncertainty over the PG situation. You think it&#8217;s difficult for Raptor fans, try being Jose Calderon.  He&#8217;s lived through T.J. Ford, Jarrett Jack and now Jerryd Bayless. Everyone of those players had better physical skills than Calderon, but none of them could ultimately replace him. Why? Because none [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another year in Raptorland, another summer of uncertainty over the PG situation. You think it&#8217;s difficult for Raptor fans, try being <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/c/caldejo01.html" target="_blank">Jose  Calderon</a>.  He&#8217;s lived through <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/f/fordtj01.html" target="_blank">T.J.  Ford</a>, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/j/jackja01.html" target="_blank">Jarrett  Jack</a> and now <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/b/bayleje01.html" target="_blank">Jerryd  Bayless</a>. Everyone of those players had better physical skills than Calderon, but none of them could ultimately replace him.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1300" style="margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 10px;" title="&lt;a target=" alt="" /><a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/jose-calderon.jpg" class="thickbox no_icon" rel="gallery-1299" title="&lt;a target="><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1300" style="margin: 5px;" title="&lt;a target=" alt="" /></a><a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/jose-calderon.jpg" class="thickbox no_icon" rel="gallery-1299" title="Jose Calderon doing what he's supposed to do: Pass"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1300" style="margin: 5px;" title="Jose Calderon doing what he's supposed to do: Pass" src="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/jose-calderon.jpg" alt="" width="298" height="410" /></a>Why? Because none of them actually possessed the skill that Calderon had that has continually put him back in charge of the team&#8217;s offense again and again: The ability to run a team and make his teammates better.</p>
<p>If this year&#8217;s playoffs have showed us one thing (and they&#8217;ve shown us more than that, but that&#8217;s for another post), it&#8217;s the importance of someone who can distribute the ball and make those around him better. In most cases, that&#8217;s your PG.</p>
<p><a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/w/westbru01.html" target="_blank">Russell  Westbrook</a>, despite his All-Star season, is rumoured to be not as secure in Oklahoma as he was before the playoffs after it became apparent that he&#8217;s still not a true PG, something that hurt the Thunder against the Mavs.</p>
<p>Speaking of the Mavs, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/k/kiddja01.html" target="_blank">Jason  Kidd</a>, despite the fact that he&#8217;s closer in age to me than his teammate, Dirk, has been able to help lead his team to the NBA FInals.</p>
<p>But wait, you say, Miami doesn&#8217;t have a great PG on their team and they&#8217;re in the NBA Finals, too! Yes, but none of their PGs actually run the team. That&#8217;s up to two of the best players in the league, in <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/j/jamesle01.html" target="_blank">LeBron  James</a> and Dywane Wade, and LeBron maybe the best passing SF the game has seen since Larry Bird. So, unless you have a truly transcendent passer at another position, it&#8217;s probably best if you have a PG that can actually run an offense and make his teammates better.</p>
<p><a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/brandonknight.jpg" class="thickbox no_icon" rel="gallery-1299" title="Brandon Knight"><img class="size-full wp-image-1301 alignleft" style="margin-top: 5px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-right: 10px;" title="Brandon Knight" src="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/brandonknight.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="400" /></a>That&#8217;s why the upcoming draft is such a concern with me. The player that seems to be the most probable Raptor, come June 23rd, seems to be Brandon Knight. Now, I have nothing against Brandon Knight. I think he&#8217;s a very good player and, from what I gather, is a very intelligent young man. My problem, however, is that he doesn&#8217;t seem to actually be a point guard. None of his strengths (size, scoring ability) are those that you&#8217;d look for in a point guard and his weaknesses (questionable decision making, turnover prone, not a great passer) are kind of red flags for a point guard, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
<p>The argument I&#8217;ve heard supporting drafting him is that he can learn the point guard position. Lots of players have come into the league with questionable PG skills and flourished, haven&#8217;t they? Well, no. Not really.</p>
<p>In the last ten years, 19 PGs with universally questionable PG skills have been drafted in the first round: <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/b/bledser01.html" target="_blank">Eric  Bledsoe</a>, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/b/bradlav01.html" target="_blank">Avery  Bradley</a>, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/f/flynnjo01.html" target="_blank">Jonny  Flynn</a>, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/h/holidjr01.html" target="_blank">Jrue  Holiday</a>, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/c/curryst01.html" target="_blank">Stephen  Curry</a>, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/w/westbru01.html" target="_blank">Russell  Westbrook</a>, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/b/bayleje01.html" target="_blank">Jerryd  Bayless</a>, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/h/hillge01.html" target="_blank">George  Hill</a>, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/s/stuckro01.html" target="_blank">Rodney  Stuckey</a>, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/b/brookaa01.html" target="_blank">Aaron  Brooks</a>, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/b/brownsh01.html" target="_blank">Shannon  Brown</a>, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/r/robinna01.html" target="_blank">Nate  Robinson</a>, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/h/headlu01.html" target="_blank">Luther  Head</a>, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/gordobe01.html" target="_blank">Ben  Gordon</a>, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/h/harride01.html" target="_blank">Devin  Harris</a>, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/w/westde01.html" target="_blank">Delonte  West</a>, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/h/hinriki01.html" target="_blank">Kirk  Hinrich</a>, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/b/banksma01.html" target="_blank">Marcus  Banks</a> and <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/d/dixonju01.html" target="_blank">Juan  Dixon</a>.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s not including scoring PGs, who showed the ability to run an offense in college, but whose best attribute was probably scoring, like <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/w/walljo01.html" target="_blank">John  Wall</a> or <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/r/rosede01.html" target="_blank">Derrick  Rose</a>. It also doesn&#8217;t include those that were really SGs, but their teams decided to try and convert them to PG, like <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/e/evansty01.html" target="_blank">Tyreke  Evans</a>, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/f/foyera01.html" target="_blank">Randy  Foye</a> and Joe Forte.</p>
<p>Now, there are a lot of talented players on that list. But there are also a lot of players who either have been shipped around from team to team because teams end up longing for a real PG to run their offense, or simply become bench players who can provide instant offense off the bench. And only one of those players have been able to lead his team past the first round of the playoffs as a starting PG. <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/w/westbru01.html" target="_blank">Russell  Westbrook</a>. And, as I mentioned, Westbrook&#8217;s lack of true PG skills is coming back to haunt him.</p>
<p>Coincidentally, a lot of those PGs with questionable PG skills have been on the wish lists of a lot of Raptor fans over the years. And not coincidentally, most of them have been on the trading block numerous times. The reason is that, despite their offensive skills, teams begin to tire of their inability to actually do what a point guard is supposed to do and run an offense and make those around him better.</p>
<p>The latest is current Minnesota Timberwolves &#8220;PG&#8221;, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/f/flynnjo01.html" target="_blank">Jonny  Flynn</a>, who apparently is a favourite of many to be traded to the Raptors. Minnesota surprised many when they selected Flynn as high as they did, and he responded by giving them a mediocre rookie season and a horrible sophomore season. When he came out of Syracuse, <a  href="http://www.nbadraft.net/players/jonny-flynn" target="_blank">NBADraft.net had this to say about him</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Lockdown defender on the perimeter. Flynn enjoys playing defense and seems to take pride in shutting down opposing point guards&#8230; Has the basketball IQ, focus and skills to excel as a pick-and-roll point guard at the next level&#8230; More of a scorer than a distributor. Detractors question his ability to play the point guard position and run a team. Is he a natural point guard? Is he really ready? On the positive side, he&#8217;s a heady player who will likely learn as he goes and improve&#8230; Will need to adapt to not having the ball in his hands all the time when he gets to the NBA … Will also have to limit turnovers &#8230; Flynn averaged 3.4 TOs per game as a sophomore&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not quite sure WHY everyone seems to want this guy. I have nothing against him, but he really doesn&#8217;t seem to be a PG and he certainly hasn&#8217;t impressed anyone so far in his NBA career.</p>
<p>Interestingly, Brandon Knight is considered to be an excellent defender, with a high IQ and very good at running the pick and roll. He&#8217;s also got questionable PG skills and there are real questions whether he can play the point in the NBA. He&#8217;s got many of the same strengths and weaknesses attributed to Flynn when he came out of college.</p>
<p>So what is it exactly about these PGs that lack PG skills that seem to attract so many Raptor fans? I really have no idea. If the survivability of Calderon as a Raptor shows us anything it&#8217;s that the ability to run a team trumps just about any other skill a PG has. There are certain skills in the NBA that are instinctual. Rebounding is instinctual. Players either can do it or they can&#8217;t. It&#8217;s why a guy like Bargnani can&#8217;t seem to rebound consistently despite obvious physical abilities, yet a guy like <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/e/evansre01.html" target="_blank">Reggie  Evans</a>, who is shorter than most others at his position, rebounds like a demon in heat. Playing the point is instinctual. You can&#8217;t think when you&#8217;re out there, you have to react instinctively. That&#8217;s why so many combo guards struggle, and ultimately fail, to make the transition. Because while they can understand HOW to play the position, they never acquire the instincts of a PG.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>Speaking of combo guards, I read today that <a  href="http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/sixerville/DN_Sixerville_master_post_-_Cooney.html" target="_blank">Monta Ellis is rumoured to possibly be on the move to Philadelphia for Andre Iguodala</a>. Now, if this is true, it doesn&#8217;t surprise me at all considering that Jerry West was hired in an advisory role recently. Now, it makes no sense from Philadelphia&#8217;s perspective, since they already have an offensive minded, undersized SG on their roster, in Lou Williams, but from Golden State&#8217;s it makes perfect sense. Iguodala would upgrade their defense and passing, which are two major weaknesses for the team. Iguodala is the perfect backcourt partner for Curry, who is not a true PG, because he does everything well that Curry struggles at. Now if only they can get rid of <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/l/leeda02.html" target="_blank">David  Lee</a> for someone who actually plays defense&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/06/the-pg-conundrum-other-nba-stories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trades, Trades and More Trades!</title>
		<link>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/02/trades-trades-and-more-trades/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/02/trades-trades-and-more-trades/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 08:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim W.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blazers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobcats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cavs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celtics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clippers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grizzlies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hornets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jazz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuggets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raptors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rockets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Wolves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thunder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wizards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/?p=1261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It says something about me that my three favourite times of the year, in the NBA, are the Playoffs, the Draft and just before the trade deadline. It&#8217;s like Christmas three times a year, but my bank account doesn&#8217;t get drained by it. Like my offseason grades, I&#8217;m going to look at each team and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It says something about me that my three favourite times of the year, in the NBA, are the Playoffs, the Draft and just before the trade deadline. It&#8217;s like Christmas three times a year, but my bank account doesn&#8217;t get drained by it.</p>
<p>Like my offseason grades, I&#8217;m going to look at each team and look at what they did as a whole, starting with the Raptors&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>TORONTO: Incomplete</strong></p>
<p><em>- James Johnson for Heat&#8217;s 2011 First Round Pick</em></p>
<p>For the Raptors, they didn&#8217;t make a big splash, but they did make one trade. Miami&#8217;s first round pick in the upcoming draft for James Johnson. To be honest, I was not a fan of Johnson coming out of Wake Forest. It didn&#8217;t instil me with confidence when both his name and Earl Clark&#8217;s were both mentioned as possibilities for the 9th pick that was eventually used to pick DeMar DeRozan. Both Johnson and Clark had fatal flaws that I turn me right off prospects. Things like &#8220;Low Basketball IQ&#8221;, or &#8220;Lack of Defensive Fundamentals&#8221; or worst of all, &#8220;Lack of Focus&#8221;. The &#8220;focus&#8221; issue is something that scares me off more than anything. This is actually something I&#8217;m going to discuss in a later post, but suffice is to say, I wasn&#8217;t a James Johnson fan.</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;m giving Toronto an incomplete grade on this for a couple of reasons. The first is that no one really knows what kind of player James Johnson is. Yes, I know he played well in his Raptor debut against his old team, the Bulls, but that was one game. Let&#8217;s see how he does for the remaining 24 before we make any judgements.</p>
<p>The other reason they get an incomplete is because we really don&#8217;t know whether this draft is going to be as bad as people seem to think it is going to be. And that&#8217;s not just the players, but the value of the draft picks. Right now, it seems draft picks for the upcoming draft are being given away like Carmelo Anthony Nugget jerseys. Personally, I would have liked to see if the Heat pick could have been packaged to move up in the draft, or to try and draft a sleeper. Still, I don&#8217;t dislike the trade because the Heat&#8217;s pick looks like it&#8217;s going to be around 27, and the chances of finding a quality player that far down is extremely slim, especially if this draft is as bad as people say.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll say this, if Johnson continues to play like he did in his debut, then this trade is a home run. He showed everything the Raptors lack, and he&#8217;ll be given every chance.</p>
<p><strong>OKLAHOMA CITY: Exceeds Expectations</strong></p>
<p><em>- Kendrick Perkins and Nate Robinson for Jeff Green and Nenad Krstic</em></p>
<p><em></em><em>- Nazr Mohommed for Morris Peterson and D.J. White </em></p>
<p>This past summer, I<a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2010/09/grading-the-offseason-17-10/"> gave the Thunder a &#8220;Meets Expectations&#8221; grade</a> because, while they made some good moves, they failed to fill the hole in the middle. With the only good defensive player in the middle being Serge Ibaka, and Cole Aldrich looking like a potential bust, the Thunder desperately needed another good big man. I suggested, before the New Year, <a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2010/12/top-5-trades-that-need-to-happen-in-201/">trading Jeff Green, Aldrich and a 1st round pick to Cleveland for Anderson Varejao</a>, but Varejao&#8217;s season ending injury pretty much killed that possibility. Instead of Varejao, they went out and got Kendrick Perkins.</p>
<p>Am I the only one who thinks this might shift the balance of power in the West?</p>
<p>Oklahoma&#8217;s biggest weakness this year has been their defense. They can score, but with Green and Krstic as their starting front court, they had trouble stopping people.</p>
<p>Now they have one of the best defensive centers in the league, in Perkins, and one of the best up and coming defensive big men in the league, in Ibaka. While they still lack a true low post scoring threat, a fact that might haunt them come the playoffs, this could be the move that launches them from pretender to true contender. Especially in the West where San Antonio and the Lakers are the two teams you have to go through. Now oklahoma can match their size.</p>
<p>And then they grabbed Nazr Mohammed as Perkins&#8217; backup. Yes, Nazr is vastly overpaid, but it&#8217;s expiring, so it doesn&#8217;t matter.</p>
<p>The only question is whether or not Perkins is healthy. If he is, then Oklahoma made out the best of anyone.</p>
<p><strong>DENVER: Exceeds Expectations</strong></p>
<p><em>- </em><em>Danilo Gallinari, </em><em>Wilson Chandler, </em><em>Raymond Felton, </em><em>Timofey Mozgov, </em><em>Kosta Koufos, K</em><em>nicks first-round pick (2014 or later) and the </em><em>Warriors&#8217; second-round picks in 2012 and 2013 for Carmelo Anthony, </em><em>Chauncey Billups, </em><em>Shelden Williams, </em><em>Renaldo Balkman and </em><em>Anthony Carter</em></p>
<p><a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/02/carmelo-the-fallout-and-why-i-hate-the-all-star-game-2/">I already discussed this deal</a>, but I&#8217;ll just say that with their back against the wall and everyone knowing where Carmelo would eventually go, Denver did very well. I thought they had secured 2 first round picks, but apparently not. Still staying out of this year&#8217;s draft probably isn&#8217;t such a bad thing. They got some nice young talent they can eventually flip for something, or try and develop themselves. Either way, they&#8217;ve got a lot of choices, now. And they&#8217;ll probably still compete for a playoff spot with the talent they have.</p>
<p><strong>NEW JERSEY: Exceeds Expectations</strong></p>
<p><em>- Deron Williams for </em><em>Devin Harris, </em><em>Derrick Favors and t</em><em>wo 2011 first-round picks</em></p>
<p><em></em><em>- </em><em>Brandan Wright and </em><em>Dan Gadzuric for Troy Murphy and Net&#8217;s 2112 second-round pick</em></p>
<p>No deal has ever surprised me like Deron Williams going to the Nets. In this day and age, where everyone seems to know everything, that one came out of left field. And without any warning. Personally, I think Deron might be a better player than Anthony, but either way, I think he&#8217;s going to help the team more than Anthony ever could. He makes his teammates better and should be able to attract some talent to the Nets, something they failed to do this past summer.</p>
<p>Getting Williams was certainly a risk. Favors could blow up to be a great player and they gave up their lottery pick in the upcoming draft, which apparently has no protection, plus Golden State&#8217;s protected pick next year. Plus, Williams might just leave in a year and a half. But I doubt it.</p>
<p>And getting something for Troy Murphy was pretty good. Wright can&#8217;t seem to stay healthy, but there was a time when he held a lot of promise. New Jersey can afford to gamble on him.</p>
<p><strong>HOUSTON: Exceeds Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Hasheem Thabeet, DeMarre Carroll and Memphis&#8217; first-round pick for Shane Battier and Ishmael Smith</em></p>
<p><em>- Goran Dragic and Phoenix&#8217;s protected first-round pick for Aaron Brooks</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been a fan of Battier since his days at Duke, and would love him to eventually go to a real contender, where he deserves, but Houston was not going to make the playoffs, and he probably wasn&#8217;t going to return as a free agent this summer. Getting a project like Thabeet is a low risk gamble that could pay off big, especially if he fulfills the expectations that made him a 2nd pick.</p>
<p>Brooks, on the other hand, is the type of PG I dislike. He&#8217;s a shoot first PG that makes his teammates grumble with his shot selection and unwillingness to pass. Yes, he can score, but I like my PGs to make everyone else better, and Brooks doesn&#8217;t do that.</p>
<p>Plus, they got a couple of first round picks. Not a bad days work.</p>
<p><strong>PORTLAND: Meets Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Gerald Wallace for </em><em>Joel Przybilla, </em><em>Dante Cunningham, </em><em>Sean Marks and t</em><em>wo first-round draft picks</em></p>
<p>Portland got exceptionally better, and gave up very little. Wallace can play PF and give them a small lineup that can still rebound, or play SF and give them a big lineup. With Roy still a question mark, getting a guy like Wallace, who can score, rebound and defend, was important. Plus, he&#8217;s only 28 despite being the league 9 years.</p>
<p><strong>CLIPPERS: Meets Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Mo Williams and Jamario Moon for Baron Davis and the Clipper&#8217;s 2011 first-round pick</em></p>
<p>Another surprise, since Baron Davis had been playing fairly well recently. Of course, the smart GM would use that opportunity to trade him. Who knew the Clippers had a smart GM?</p>
<p>One of the worst things the Clippers have done in the last decade (and there&#8217;s been a lot to choose from) might have been giving Davis that huge contract. In 11 seasons in the NBA, Davis has had exactly one exceptional season where he was completely healthy. The season before the Clippers signed him away from Golden State.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never been a fan of Mo Williams but if it&#8217;s a choice between him for 3 more years at $8.5 million and Baron Davis for 3 more years at $14 million, I&#8217;m going to choose Mo every time. And while giving up a lottery pick might seem like a steep price to get rid of Davis, the last thing the Clippers need right now is another young player, and no one&#8217;s liking the look of this draft, so it might end up being worthless, anyway.</p>
<p><strong>ATLANTA: Meets Expectation</strong>s</p>
<p>- <em>Kirk Hinrich and Hilton Armstrong for Mike Bibby, Maurice Evans, Jordan Crawford and Atlanta&#8217;s 2011 first-round pick</em></p>
<p>I thought trading for Bibby a few years ago was fantastic for the Hawks. They desperately needed a veteran PG and Bibby had been in the playoff trenches. But he&#8217;s not the player he once was, and his defense is now pretty much non existent. Hinrich is a massive upgrade, and is an excellent defense. Plus, like Bibby, he doesn&#8217;t need the ball to be effective, which is important playing next to Joe Johnson.</p>
<p><strong>NEW YORK: Meets Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Carmelo Anthony, </em><em>Chauncey Billups,</em><em>Shelden Williams, </em><em>Renaldo Balkman and </em><em>Anthony Carter</em> for <em>Danilo Gallinari, </em><em>Wilson Chandler, </em><em>Raymond Felton, </em><em>Timofey Mozgov, </em><em>Kosta Koufos, K</em><em>nicks first-round pick (2014 or later) and the </em><em>Warriors&#8217; second-round picks in 2012 and 2013</em></p>
<p>As I said, <a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/02/carmelo-the-fallout-and-why-i-hate-the-all-star-game-2/">I already discussed this deal</a>, and New York obviously came out of the trade with the best player, but I&#8217;m not convinced New York is ever going to be a serious contender with Anthony and Amare.</p>
<p><strong>NEW ORLEANS: Meets Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Carl Landry for Marcus Thornton</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a big fan of either of these guys, but Thornton wasn&#8217;t getting any time because he apparently doesn&#8217;t play defense, and New Orleans is sorely lacking inside scoring. Enter Landry, who doesn&#8217;t rebound and isn&#8217;t a great defender, but can score inside.</p>
<p><strong>CHICAGO: Meets Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Miami&#8217;s 2011 first-round pick for James Johnson</em></p>
<p>Johnson was obviously not going to break into the Bulls&#8217; lineup, so getting a first round pick was probably the best thing they could have done.</p>
<p><strong>MEMPHIS: Approaching Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em><em>Shane Battier and Ishmael Smith for <em><em>Hasheem Thabeet, DeMarre Carroll and Memphis&#8217; first-round pick</em></em></em></em></p>
<p>Giving up Thabeet and a first-round pick was a big gamble for a player who might not eve re-sign with Memphis this summer, but Battier is exactly the type of player they need. A steady, smart veteran who doesn&#8217;t need the ball to be effective and who knows how to win. Memphis obviously hopes he&#8217;ll rub off on everyone else on the team.</p>
<p>I still think they should have traded Zach Randolph while his stock was so high.</p>
<p><strong>BOSTON: Approaching Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em><em>Jeff Green and Nenad Krstic</em><span style="font-style: normal;"> for </span></em><em><em>Kendrick Perkins and Nate Robinson</em></em></p>
<p><em><em>- Sacramento&#8217;s second-round pick for </em></em><em><em>Marquis Daniels</em></em></p>
<p><em><em>- Cleveland&#8217;s second-round pick for </em>Semih Erden and L</em><em>uke Harangody</em></p>
<p>When Kendrick Perkins got injured a couple of seasons ago in the playoffs, it cost the Celtics the title. He might be one of the best centers in the league at defending Dwight Howard. Trading away a very good defensive center in his prime is a huge, huge risk. One I think might come back to haunt the Celtics.</p>
<p>I like Jeff Green, and I think not being forced to play PF will do him a world of good, and I think he&#8217;s a very good defender at the SF position, but basically the Celtics gave up a starter for a bench player. They are going to have to rely on Shaq a lot more at center, and this quote from Doc Rivers doesn&#8217;t do a lot for me: &#8221;Shaq&#8217;s a key component of this,&#8221; said Rivers. &#8220;We need to get Shaq healthy and Shaq will be healthy. If Shaq plays great, this deal was actually really good for us. That&#8217;s on Shaq. We have to get Shaq in great shape, get him ready, get him healthy. He&#8217;s really going to be important for us in the playoffs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Plus, the Celtics are going to have two players (Shaq and Rondo) who can&#8217;t hit free throws. You don&#8217;t think that might hurt them?</p>
<p><strong>SACRAMENTO: Approaching Expectations</strong></p>
<p><em>- Marcus Thornton for Carl Landry</em></p>
<p><em>- Marquis Daniels for a second-round pick</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not quite sure why Sacramento would want Thornton or Daniels, since they already have Evans Casspi and Garcia, but I guess they didn&#8217;t give up much, so why not.</p>
<p><strong>MINNESOTA: Approaching Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Anthony Randolph and Eddy Curry for Corey Brewer</em></p>
<p>Yes, Minnesota is acquiring assets, but Corey Brewer is more productive than Anthony Randolph, and Minnesota agreed to take on Eddy Curry to get him. Randolph better end up panning out.</p>
<p><strong>WASHINGTON: Approaching Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Mike Bibby, Maurice Evans, Jordan Crawford and Atlanta&#8217;s 2011 first-round pick for Kirk Hinrich and Hilton Armstrong</em></p>
<p>I find it hard to believe that the best Washington could have gotten for Hinrich was Mike Bibby and another year of his contract and a late first-round pick in a bad draft. It&#8217;s not bad, but I wouldn&#8217;t say it was good, either.</p>
<p><strong>CLEVELAND: WHY??????</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Baron Davis  and the Clippers 2011 first-round pick for Mo Williams and Jamario Moon</em></p>
<p><em>- <em>Semih Erden and L</em><em>uke Harangody for a second-round pick</em></em></p>
<p>I can understand wanting to get the Clippers first round pick (probably a top 10 pick), but is it really worth taking on Baron Davis when you couldn&#8217;t even get rid of Antoine Jamison and his awful contract?</p>
<p><strong>PHOENIX: Your Kid Is A Moron</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Aaron Brooks for Goran Dragic and Phoenix&#8217;s protected first-round pick</em></p>
<p>I have absolutely no idea what Phoenix is doing. Brooks is a brutal PG because he can&#8217;t pass, so he&#8217;s the anti-Nash. And they gave up a first round pick when they should be collecting them.</p>
<p><strong>UTAH: Incomplete</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Devin Harris, </em><em>Derrick Favors and t</em><em>wo 2011 first-round picks</em> for <em>Deron Williams</em></p>
<p>As I previously said, this trade came out of nowhere, and I&#8217;m not quite sure how I feel about it from Utah&#8217;s perspective. If Williams was indeed on his way out of town, as some have said, then trading him now was a fantastic idea. And getting what they did for him was very good. Personally, I liked the Nets offer for Carmelo better than the Knicks, and the Jazz ended up getting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/02/trades-trades-and-more-trades/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Raptor Roundup and Orlando&#8217;s Magic</title>
		<link>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2010/12/raptor-roundup-and-orlandos-magic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2010/12/raptor-roundup-and-orlandos-magic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2010 10:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim W.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raptors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wizards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/?p=1186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Raptors go up against the Lakers today, and the best news for Raptor fans is that Kobe sprained another finger and is not even close to 100%. Unfortunately, he&#8217;s still Kobe and the Lakers are still the Lakers, so I wouldn&#8217;t expect any big miracles. The Lakers went through a bit of a slump, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Raptors go up against the Lakers today, and the best news for Raptor fans is that Kobe sprained another finger and is not even close to 100%. Unfortunately, he&#8217;s still Kobe and the Lakers are still the Lakers, so I wouldn&#8217;t expect any big miracles. The Lakers went through a bit of a slump, but have gone 4-1 on their East coast road trip. Of course, the only +.500 team they&#8217;ve faced have been the Bulls, who they lost to. Andrew Bynum is back for the Lakers, but he&#8217;s struggled so far and it will be a while until he probably regains his rhythm. A game against the Raptors might be exactly what he needs.</p>
<p>After a thrilling win against New Jersey, allow me to throw some cold water over things. It took career nights from both Bargnani and Kleiza, and a season best game from Calderon for the Raptors to barely beat the East&#8217;s second worst team at home, despite no New Jersey player playing really an above average game. The Lakers are a tad better than New Jersey.</p>
<p>On the plus side, Bargnani was barely recognizable in the second half, against the Nets. He was aggressive, and not just on offense, and despite a few miscues on defense (including allowing Brook Lopez to dunk on a post up right after Bargnani brought everyone to their seats on a drive and dunk- which was a microcosm of why he frustrates me), Bargnani had the best game I&#8217;ve ever seen him play. Yes, he took 26 shots to score 32 points, but most of those misses occurred in the first half. Ironically, it&#8217;s usually the first half that he does most of his damage, generally being content to fade into the background in the second half.</p>
<p>The Lakers have much better defenders to try and stop Bargnani on the offensive end. He played poorly against then in Los Angeles and there&#8217;s a very good chance will do the same today.</p>
<p>One big reason the Raptors were able to come back against the Nets was their use of the zone against them. Triano gets a lot of criticism, and in my opinion unwarranted most of the time, but he out-coached his more respected counterpart last night. Lopez didn&#8217;t go off, but he still was able to score 20 points on 7-13 shooting. What hurt them were his 6 turnovers, mostly caused by the swarming double teams the Raptors sent his way, as well as the zone he had to contend with.</p>
<p>The Lakers have much better 3 point shooters than New Jersey does, so a zone won&#8217;t work as well against them. That means that Gasol will probably have his way against the Raptors front line.</p>
<p>Kleiza certainly took advantage of getting back in the starting lineup, and may have made a case for returning there full time. The question is whether it would be simply to put Kleiza on display to up his trade value. I still firmly believe that both Kleiza and Barbosa should be shopped before the trade deadline this season. While they both bring attributes the Raptors need, I think they&#8217;re more valuable to the team as trade bait. Can they get a first round pick or two in return?</p>
<p>ORLANDO TRYING TO WORK SOME MAGIC</p>
<p>Speaking of trades, I did a double take when I saw a report that the Magic have sent Vince Carter, Marcin Gortat, Mickael Pietrus and a 2011 draft pick to Phoenix for former Magic player, Hedo Turkoglu, as well as Jason Richardson and Earl Clark. If that was it, it would still be a team transforming trade. But they also traded Rashard Lewis to Washington for Gilbert Arenas.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my take on the trades:</p>
<p>ORLANDO</p>
<p>Orlando has struggled lately, but for a contender to make such massive changes is unheard of. If Otis Smith truly feels that things are not working with the current roster, then I applaud his aggressiveness, but talk about risky. Not only is there a danger in bringing in three such dominant players, but not one of them has ever been known for his defense. That&#8217;s putting a lot of pressure on Dwight Howard on the defensive end, as much as it takes away pressure on the offensive end. And he also Orlando loses it&#8217;s only real backup center. And I haven&#8217;t even mentioned the contracts, yet.</p>
<p>When Orlando overpaid Rashard Lewis with that $100 million, three and a half years ago, it was a big gamble. Although he never was the player he was in Seattle, the gamble paid off. At first. Orlando even went to the Finals his second year in Orlando and made the All-Star team. Unfortunately every year his production declined culminating in this year, where he&#8217;s averaging an 11 year low 12.2 ppg on just .419 shooting. Way too low for a guy making $65 million over the next three years.</p>
<p>Lewis was quickly becoming untradeable, so they found another untradeable player they could trade him for in Gilbert Arenas. Arenas has a very good chance of helping the team more than Lewis, but the question is whether he&#8217;ll be more of a distraction than a help. He didn&#8217;t help Washington win much this year, but a change of scenery may help.</p>
<p>Acquiring Vince Carter was obviously a failure, as many Raptor fans could have predicted. Apparently they also feel letting Turkoglu go in the first place was also a mistake. Orlando definitely had it&#8217;s most success when Turkoglu was on the team, and have definitely not been the same since he left, but I&#8217;m not sure getting him back was really the best option for Orlando.</p>
<p>Turkoglu turns 32 this year, has declined a fair bit every year since he won the Most Improved Player Award three and a half years ago, and has never shown an inclination to really stay in shape or work hard. And he&#8217;s owed $42 million over the next four years. Add Gilbert Arenas&#8217; nearly $80 million over the next four years and Orlando is investing A LOT of money in this deal. A lot.  If this fails, Orlando is going to have a hell of a time digging themselves out of this hole.</p>
<p>Jason Richardson is the least risky acquisition for Orlando. There&#8217;s no doubt he can score, but like Turkoglu and Arenas, defense is not his strong suit. This might end up being a problem for Orlando, since they&#8217;re trading away two strong defenders in Gortat and Pietrus.</p>
<p>As I said, this trade is a huge, huge risk for Orlando. It will either be a home run or a disaster. My guess is it will be the latter.</p>
<p>Grade: C-</p>
<p>PHOENIX</p>
<p>In one fell swoop, Phoenix made over their roster, vastly improved their defense and gave themselves a brighter future. Trading for Turkoglu was a big mistake and Phoenix figured that out fairly quickly. Getting Carter&#8217;s expiring contract for him was extremely fortunate. How Carter performs in Phoenix is largely irrelevant, since it is his expiring contract that they wanted. Still, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if he sees a rise in his production playing next to Steve Nash.</p>
<p>Gortat should finally get a chance to start, and should immediately help Phoenix on the defensive end and on the boards. A team that has historically not been strong at the center position now has 3 that will battle it out for minutes. I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if Phoenix isn&#8217;t done dealing.</p>
<p>Pietrus was caught in a numbers game in Orlando, but should get plenty of minutes in Phoenix and probably even start.</p>
<p>Despite losing Jason Richardson&#8217;s scoring, this was a very good trade for Phoenix. Not only for the future, but I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if it helps in the win column this year. They even get a first round pick out of it.</p>
<p>GRADE: A</p>
<p>WASHINGTON</p>
<p>Getting rid of Gilbert Arenas was a priority for a team that needed to separate itself from the past and give the keys to John Wall. Lewis not only has a (slightly) shorter contract, he fills a need for the Wizards.</p>
<p>GRADE: B+</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2010/12/raptor-roundup-and-orlandos-magic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

