<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Picket Fence &#187; Thunder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/category/teams/thunder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence</link>
	<description>A discussion about basketball.  More specifically the Raptors and the NBA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 19:00:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Or &#8220;Why tanking isn&#8217;t such a bad thing&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/12/or-why-tanking-isnt-such-a-bad-thing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/12/or-why-tanking-isnt-such-a-bad-thing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 07:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim W.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cavs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clippers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raptors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thunder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/?p=1469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(If you haven&#8217;t read the first and second parts, please do, as this post will make a lot more sense if you do) So in parts 1 and 2, we looked at the 16 year history of the Raptors organization that seemed to be so focused on not losing that it couldn&#8217;t manage to actually [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/mediocrity.png" class="thickbox no_icon" rel="gallery-1469" title="Mediocrity, thy name is Raptors basketball"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1470" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="Mediocrity, thy name is Raptors basketball" src="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/mediocrity-274x300.png" alt="" width="274" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>(If you haven&#8217;t read the <a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/12/those-who-cannot-remember-the-past/">first</a> and <a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/12/are-condemned-to-repeat-it/">second</a> parts, please do, as this post will make a lot more sense if you do)</p>
<p>So in parts <a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/12/those-who-cannot-remember-the-past/">1</a> and <a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/12/are-condemned-to-repeat-it/">2</a>, we looked at the 16 year history of the Raptors organization that seemed to be so focused on not losing that it couldn&#8217;t manage to actually win, very much. The Raptors have spent nearly their entire existence on the mediocrity treadmill. For an NBA team and it&#8217;s fans, that&#8217;s basically hell.</p>
<p>So now we turn our attention to a few other franchises, and see what they&#8217;ve done.</p>
<p>CLEVELAND FLIRTS WITH A CHAMPIONSHIP</p>
<p>When Cleveland drafted LeBron James, it was probably the greatest turning point in their entire existence. Except for a brief period in the 90&#8242;s, the Cavaliers were synonymous with poor management and losing.</p>
<p>When LeBron was drafted, the Cavs roster was made up of a collection of mediocre veterans and a few promising youngsters (Carlos Boozer, Ricky Davis, Darius Miles). the promising, but flawed, youngsters were traded away or left, and in their place came veterans who could help the team immediately.</p>
<p>While they were able to acquire Anderson Varejao, the majority of the moves the Cavs made were either forgettable or one you&#8217;d rather forget (trading a first round pick for Jiri Welsch in February and then turning around and trading Welsch for a 2nd round pick- turning a 1st round pick into a second in a matter of months!). Still the team went from 17 wins the season before LeBron, to 35 and then 42 wins. It was obvious this team was on it&#8217;s way up.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1472" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="cleveland_cavaliers_lebron_james-9793" src="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/cleveland_cavaliers_lebron_james-9793-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" />When Danny Ferry was hired as the Cavs GM, in 2005, he made an immediate splash, signing volume scorer, the 27 year old Larry Hughes to a massive contract, and 32 year old Donyell Marshall (from the Raptors). At that point, of the 8 players that played the most minutes, only 2 were below the age of 26. They did go out and win 50 games and get to the second round of the playoffs, though.</p>
<p>The next season, with Danny Ferry basically standing pat with the roster, the team went out and won 50 games again, this time getting all the way to the Finals. Despite the success in the playoffs, the Cavs didn&#8217;t carry over the momentum to the regular season and Ferry decided to shake things up, trading away almost half the roster, and grabbing among others, 33 year old Ben Wallace and 32 year old Joe Smith. The team ended up winning just 45 games and losing again in the second round.</p>
<p>Probably the best move Danny Ferry made as GM, was when he turned Joe Smith into Mo Williams. It was one of the few times that Ferry attempted to make the team younger. And somehow, the Cavs gelled and ended up destroying the league in the regular season, winning 66 games. But then the playoffs came and they got bounced in the Conference Finals by Orlando.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1473" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="Shaquille+O+Neal+Antawn+Jamison+Chicago+Bulls+ncXzHWeYLD5l" src="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Shaquille+O+Neal+Antawn+Jamison+Chicago+Bulls+ncXzHWeYLD5l-300x232.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="232" />So Ferry pulled the trigger on a trade that sent Ben Wallace to the Suns for Shaquille O&#8217;Neal. It was an act of desperation for the Cavs, who felt that winning a Championship was the only way to keep LeBron, who was in the last year of his contract. They then used a good portion of their MLE to sign 34 year old Anthony Parker, and then went out and traded for 33 year old Antawn Jamison. By season&#8217;s end, the Cavs had 3 starters who were 33, 34 and 37 and whose best years were well behind them.</p>
<p>Is it any wonder that when LeBron decided to abandon the team, they ended up winning only 19 games the next season?</p>
<p>While the Cavs ended up finding much more success than the Raptors did, using a similar plan, that was mostly due to the fact that LeBron was simply much better than Vince Carter ever was.  And the results ended up being the same. An unsustainable climb by acquiring aging veterans whose stock can only decline.</p>
<p>Like the Raptors, the Cavs had to start making riskier and riskier moves, acquiring older and older players, because when you keep acquiring declining assets, you lose more and more leverage. And just like the Raptors, right near the end they took a risk on an aging Hall of Fame center whose best years were behind him.</p>
<p><strong>OKLAHOMA DECIDES TO GO YOUNG</strong></p>
<p>The Thunder are probably one of the most discussed teams, in terms of building through the draft with youth, but quite frankly, that&#8217;s because they&#8217;ve done a textbook-like job.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1476" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="rayandrashard" src="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/rayandrashard-255x300.jpg" alt="" width="255" height="300" />When Sam Presti took over the then Seattle Supersonics, they had just come off a 31 win season, had two 20+ppg All-Stars on the roster, some half decent young talent and a number 2 pick in the draft. After drafting 19 year old Kevin Durant, Presti made a choice that was basically the complete opposite of what the Raptors and Cleveland had done. Keeping former All-Stars, Rashard Lewis and Ray Allen would certainly have made the team competitive, possibly even a playoff team with a move or two, Presti wisely decided that at ages 27 and 31, Lewis and Allen were declining assets who would probably be too old to help the team when Durant was entering his prime.</p>
<p>Presti first traded Allen for 5th pick, Jeff Green, as well as Wally Szczerbiak and his expiring contract, and Delonte West, both of whom were ironically traded to the Cleveland Cavaliers just one season later. Then Presti decided not to match Orlando&#8217;s massive contract offer for Lewis, leaving the team without their two best players in a matter of days.</p>
<p>Instead of surrounding Durant with veterans, which would have speeded up the team&#8217;s development, but limited it&#8217;s growth, Presti preached patience, and decided to surround their new franchise player with players his own age, allowing them to grow and develop together. While it meant the team was actually worse the next season, winning just 20 games, they were also able to pick up future All-Star, Russell Westbrook in the next draft. They improved only slightly the next season, again, giving them a top 3 pick, grabbing James Harden.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1475" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="t1larg.mavs.thunder.gi" src="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/t1larg.mavs_.thunder.gi_-300x168.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="168" /></p>
<p>In just three seasons, the Sonics/Thunder were able to acquire three top 5 picks and the very next season they jumped from 23 wins to 50 wins. They never added one major veteran over the age of 25 and by the time they win 50 games, they only had two rotation players over the age of 25- 26 year old Nenad Krstic, who signed the previous season, and 29 year old Nick Collison, who was the only holdover from the pre-Presti era.</p>
<p>And with a starting of with an average age of just 23 years old, the Oklahoma City Thunder won 55 games last season on their way to a Conference Finals appearance. And it&#8217;s certainly not inconceivable that, as long as they are able to keep their core together, the Thunder will be contenders for the next 10 years.</p>
<p>If the Thunder had kept Allen and Lewis, the team would already be trying to figure out how to replace them.</p>
<p><strong>CLIPPERS (MIS)MANAGEMENT</strong></p>
<p>One of the most common arguments again &#8220;tanking&#8221; is that you don&#8217;t want to end up like the Los Angeles Clippers. Of course, that argument may not work anymore, <a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/12/are-the-clippers-now-relevant/">after trading for Chris Paul</a>, but it never really worked anyway.</p>
<p>The problem with the Clippers was not that they were always trying to lose and get high draft picks, it&#8217;s that they were simply badly mismanaged and drafted poorly when they got to the draft.</p>
<p>If the Cleveland Cavaliers were synonymous with poor management and losing, the Clippers made them look good.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1478" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="benoit benjamin" src="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/benoit.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" />In their 47 year history, the Clippers have made the playoffs just 7 times. That&#8217;s just 2 more than the Raptors, in nearly 3 times the amount of time. To the Clippers, mediocrity would have been a step up. In the last 30 years, the Clippers have drafted in the top ten 23 times. They&#8217;ve had a top 5 pick 13 times. Yet, somehow in all that time, they only managed to draft 3 All Stars. Actually, that&#8217;s not entirely true. They drafted five All-Stars, but traded away two of them before they became All-Stars. You could probably manage a better drafting record than them by throwing darts at a board. I could probably write and entire post devoted to their poor drafting.</p>
<p>So needless to say, the Clippers have not been successful, but that turned around in the last few years, when they drafted Eric Gordon and then got the 1st pick in the draft the next year and took Blake Griffin. Unlike previous eras, when young players were traded away for veterans either past their prime or who never had one, the Clippers actually started stockpiling their young talent.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1480" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="Blake Griffins dunks on the Lakers" src="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/9129800-large-300x296.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="296" />While Griffin and Gordon are definitely stars, there&#8217;s a question of whether either are the type of elite talent that can lead a team to a Championship. Thankfully, that doesn&#8217;t matter since they were able to use their stockpile of youth and Chris Kaman&#8217;s expiring contract, to trade for Chris Paul.</p>
<p>Now, what is the difference between what Cleveland and Toronto did and what the Clippers did? There are a couple.</p>
<p>First is that Paul is only 26 years old. He&#8217;s not a 31 year old athletic wing player or 33 year old big man.</p>
<p>Secondly, and most importantly, Paul IS their franchise player now. Griffin is a great talent, he&#8217;s not the type to make those around him better. He&#8217;s not a good passer or stellar defender and most of his scoring is done by being more athletic than his opponent. He is much more suited to a complimentary role, and with Paul running the point, he can now do that.</p>
<p>Without Chris Paul, the Clippers probably had a ceiling similar to the Atlanta Hawks- the second round. The number of teams without a top 10 player on it that have been a true contender, in the last 20-30 years you can count on one hand. And now the Clippers have that.</p>
<p><strong>SO WHAT TO DO?</strong></p>
<p>So this brings us back to the Raptors and this season.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1483" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="NBA Draft Lottery" src="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/sternsballs-300x168.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="168" />Now there is a portion of Raptor fans who hate to see the Raptors lose intentionally and that nothing good ever comes from tanking. Well, first of all, I don&#8217;t think anyone is suggesting the team actually &#8220;tank&#8221;. That would involve trading away the team&#8217;s best players and not giving the team a shot to even be competitive in games. Cleveland and Denver did that and all it got them were LeBron James and Carmelo Anthony. Er&#8230;nevermind.</p>
<p>The Raptors currently have the talent to vie for the top spot in the NBA&#8230;.draft. So the best thing that Colangelo can do, and seems to be doing, is to just let them play. Don&#8217;t try to win a few more games just to make the team look slightly better. In the end that gets you nothing but what Raptor fans have had to put up with for the past 16 years. Mediocrity, at best.</p>
<p>The few more wins that a Tyson Chandler or even a Shane Battier might get you may be the difference between a top 3 pick and yet another good, but not great, draft pick. <a  href="http://www.82games.com/nbadraftpicks.htm" target="_blank">As 82Games.com showed, there&#8217;s a big dropoff after the fifth pick</a>.</p>
<p>When you&#8217;re walking the line between mediocrity and being a contender, the difference might be just a few ping pong balls.</p>
<p>Now as I mentioned in the first post, PhDSteve, over at Raptors Republic <a  href="http://raptorsrepublic.com/2011/12/14/rapcast-118-the-doctor-is-in-acquisition-review-fact-and-fiction-of-2012-draft/" target="_blank">argued in his latest podcast</a> that it doesn&#8217;t really matter where the Raptors pick because there&#8217;s no real consensus #1 and the Raptors can get a good PG later in the draft.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1484" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="TDuncan champ trophy" src="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/TDuncan-champ-trophy-222x300.jpg" alt="" width="222" height="300" />That would make sense if the Raptors biggest need is a PG. It isn&#8217;t. The Raptors biggest need, far outweighing any position or skill, is a franchise player. Who cares if the Raptors get the best PG in the draft if they still don&#8217;t have a franchise player. In the NBA, teams generally only go as far as their best player can take them. Atlanta&#8217;s problem is not that they don&#8217;t have a good team. It&#8217;s that Joe Johnson is a perennial All-Star, but not a truly elite player.</p>
<p>In fact, Toronto&#8217;s history shows the limitations teams have without truly elite players. While Vince had the potential to be one of the greats, he never fulfilled that potential and the farthest the team could get with him was the second round. Bosh was a perennial All-Star, but simply not the type of talent that can lift a team above mediocrity.</p>
<p>While there might not be any sure-fire Hall of Famers, like Tim Duncans or LeBron James&#8217;, there are still a few potential franchise players in this draft. Anthony Davis, Andre Drummond , Perry Jones and Harrison Barnes have been the most talked about (although I personally am not sure Barnes has any elite skill that would allow him to be a franchise player), but Quincy Miller and Michael Kidd-Gilchrist also have some potential. That&#8217;s six players, but most likely half are not going to fulfill that potential, so getting first crack is all the more important.</p>
<p><strong>IN CONCLUSION</strong></p>
<p>While pushing towin as many games as you can might seem like a good idea, if your goal is to compete for an NBA Championship, it&#8217;s simply not always a sound strategy. While getting one of the worst records in the league certainly is no guarantee of a top 3 pick, it gives you the best chance. It&#8217;s been said that the best thing for these young players on the Raptors is to start trying to compete now, but without a franchise player, exactly what would they be competing for? More of what we&#8217;ve seen over the last 16 years. And that&#8217;s simply not good enough.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/12/or-why-tanking-isnt-such-a-bad-thing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2011 NBA Draft Report Card!</title>
		<link>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/06/2011-nba-draft-report-card/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/06/2011-nba-draft-report-card/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 07:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim W.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[76ers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blazers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobcats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cavs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celtics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clippers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grizzlies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hornets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jazz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mavericks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuggets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pistons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raptors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rockets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Wolves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thunder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warriors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wizards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/?p=1330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TORONTO: Exceeds Expectations 5. Jonas Valanciunas It&#8217;s deja vu all over again. Last year, a team above them unexpectedly took an athletic defensive power forward which resulted in a higher ranked big man unexpectedly falling to the Raptors. Colangelo and the Raptors brass probably can&#8217;t believe their luck. I was afraid they might still take Knight, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/boy_report_card_tough_spin_schoo_1188735.jpg" class="thickbox no_icon" rel="gallery-1330" title="boy_report_card_tough_spin_schoo_1188735"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1331" style="margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="boy_report_card_tough_spin_schoo_1188735" src="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/boy_report_card_tough_spin_schoo_1188735-300x214.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="214" /></a></p>
<p><strong>TORONTO: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>5. <strong>Jonas Valanciunas</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s deja vu all over again. Last year, a team above them unexpectedly took an athletic defensive power forward which resulted in a higher ranked big man unexpectedly falling to the Raptors. Colangelo and the Raptors brass probably can&#8217;t believe their luck. I was afraid they might still take Knight, but Colangelo showed he is indeed focused on the future, rather than the present.</p>
<p>Valanciunas will fill the void at center the Raptors have been lacking for, well, ever. While apparently a lot of Raptor fans are unhappy with the pick, I think they&#8217;ll eventually regret that as Valanciunas is the type of player that Raptor fans love. He&#8217;s a high energy player who hustles, defends and rebounds. English, though, is not his strong suit.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the pick they got from the Heat, which they traded to the Bulls for James Johnson, could have been used to pick Corey Joseph at 28, who went one spot later to the Spurs. Who knows if that&#8217;s who Colangelo would have picked, as he was projected to go in the second round, but I&#8217;ll certainly be comparing their careers. And since the Spurs are pretty much never wrong&#8230;</p>
<p>I would have liked to see them try and scoop up another pick, but it&#8217;s not a big deal that they didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p><strong>SAN ANTONIO: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>29. <strong>Cory Joseph</strong></p>
<p>Traded George Hill for Indiana&#8217;s 15th pick, <strong>Kawhi Leonard</strong>.</p>
<p>I assumed the Spurs would exceed expectations, and again they have. Trading for Leonard is huge, especially since he was projected to go in the top ten and dropped. He&#8217;s the type of defender than the Spurs love, is in the perfect situation, and should step in Bruce Bowen&#8217;s shoes, that have been empty for a few years.</p>
<p>If on of my sleepers, Toronto&#8217;s Cory Joseph couldn&#8217;t get drafted by the Raptors, then the Spurs would have been my second choice. And it&#8217;s incredible timing because they might have their replacement for Hill. Yes, he projected to go in the second round, but I think he has first round talent and so, apparently, do the Spurs.haunt them. Burks should be a decent player, but guys like him are a dime a dozen.</p>
<p><strong>CHARLOTTE: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>7. <strong>Bismack Biyombo</strong><br />
9. <strong>Kemba Walker </strong></p>
<p>Traded Stephen Jackson for Sacramento&#8217;s 7th pick and Corey Maggette.</p>
<p>Sold 39th pick, Jeremy Tyler to Golden State, I&#8217;m guessing for cash.</p>
<p>It hurts to say it, but Charlotte actually did well. I was surprised that they passed on Knight for Biyombo, as they&#8217;ve been looking for a real starting PG for, well, their entire existence, but they resisted temptation and went with a guy who I think will be better down the road. I also look forward to watching Biyombo and Tyrus Thomas being on the floor at the same time. The front row needs to watch out.</p>
<p>Maggette was a disaster in Milwaukee and now brings his brand of scoring and no defense to Charlotte. He&#8217;s probably going to lose games for them, but that&#8217;s kind of what they wanted, so maybe it&#8217;s a good thing?</p>
<p>Walker fell, but not as far as I thought he might. I think it&#8217;s still a pretty good pick at 9, but Charlotte seems to like picking decent PGs with little upside.</p>
<p><strong>CHICAGO: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>23. <strong>Nikola Mirotic</strong><br />
30. <strong>Jimmy Butler</strong></p>
<p>Traded 28th and 43rd picks for Houstons 23rd pick, Nikola Mirotic.</p>
<p>Butler was very efficient offensively at Butler, and is a very good defender, so the Bulls may have a sleeper on their hands.</p>
<p>How much do you think the Spurs are pissed at not getting Mirotic, who is exactly the type of player they usually scoop up at the end up the first round? He&#8217;s a huge steal, but will play overseas for a couple of more seasons. That&#8217;s fine with the Bulls.</p>
<p><strong>DENVER: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>22. <strong>Kenneth Faried</strong><br />
26. <strong>Jordan Hamilton<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">56. </span>Chukwudiebere Maduabum</strong></p>
<p>Traded Raymond Felton for Portland&#8217;s 26th pick, Jordan Hamilton, and Andre Miller.</p>
<p>Traded for Laker&#8217;s 56th pick, Chukwudiebere Maduabum, somehow.</p>
<p>Although I haven&#8217;t confirmed that Denver is, in fact, keeping Faried, if they do this was a very good draft day. I would have liked to have seen them get more for Felton, but Miller is a good, veteran PG that will probably be shipped elsewhere soon. Plus they were able to pick up another pick and a SF who has a chance to be a decent pro.</p>
<p>Faried is the type of player that everyone loves and helps you win. So why didn&#8217;t he go higher? Probably because he&#8217;s not a scorer and a little undersized.</p>
<p>I have no idea who Chukwudiebere Maduabum, but on his <a  href="http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Chu-Chu-Maduabum-6398/" target="_blank">Draft Express profile</a>, he&#8217;s listed as Chu Chu. I think he&#8217;s worthy of picking just for that. He immediately is in the running for best All-Tim NBA name.</p>
<p><strong>MEMPHIS: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>49. <strong>Josh Selby</strong></p>
<p>Selby was considered a first round talent, so this has to be considered a steal. Where they&#8217;ll find room for him, is another thing.<br />
<strong>DETROIT: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>8. <strong>Brandon Knight</strong><br />
33. <strong>Kyle Singler</strong><br />
52. <strong>Vernon Macklin</strong></p>
<p>Although I question whether he can play PG, Knight was projected to go in the top 5 and dropped to 8th, so Pistons fans have to be happy. Of course, he kind of presents the same problems that Rodney Stuckey, who&#8217;s also a combo guard they tried to turn into a point guard, did.</p>
<p>Singler is never going to be a star, but last year he was considered a middle first round pick and they got him in the second round. I think he&#8217;ll hang on and have a decent career as a bench player.</p>
<p><strong>DALLAS: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>Traded their 26th pick to Portland for Rudy Fernandez</p>
<p>The rich get richer. Dallas has no use for a rookie and no one picked there was going to help them like Fernandez. I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if he ends up starting next year.</p>
<p><strong>LAKERS: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>41.<strong> Darius Morris</strong><br />
46. <strong>Andrew Goodelock</strong><br />
58. <strong>Ater Majok</strong></p>
<p>Without a first round pick, they were able to pick up a decent prospect, in Darius Morris. This might be the second year in a row they get at least one keeper from the second round.</p>
<p><strong>PHILADELPHIA: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>16. <strong>Nikola Vucevic</strong><br />
50. <strong>Lavoy Allen</strong></p>
<p>Vucevic should end up being a pretty good pro and probable starter. At 16, in this draft, that&#8217;s pretty damn good.</p>
<p><strong>CLEVELAND: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Meets Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>1.<strong> Kyrie Irving</strong><br />
4. <strong>Tristan Thompson<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">32.</span> Justin Harper </strong></p>
<p>Irving will probably be the best player, so it was no surprise he was the first pick.</p>
<p>Thompson was the first big surprise of the night. And while I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a bad pick, since I think Thompson is going to be a very good pro, but he was a big reach at 3. Valanciunas would have made much more sense, but apparently Cleveland wants to make an impact immediately. Something they might regret down the line.</p>
<p>I think Cleveland should have offered Minnesota everything but it&#8217;s first pick to move up to 2 and draft Williams. If they had come out of the draft with Irving AND Williams, their future would have looked A LOT brighter.</p>
<p>Justin Harper is a stretch 4 that isn&#8217;t very big and probably won&#8217;t be much of a rebounder in the NBA. If he sticks, it&#8217;s because of his shooting. On Cleveland, that&#8217;s devoid of talent, he might, but with Antawn Jamison and J.J. Hickson as well as Anderson Varejao, who will probably be traded this summer, it&#8217;s puzzling why they&#8217;d take another power forward.</p>
<p><strong>NEW YORK: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Meets Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>45. <strong>Josh Harrellson</strong></p>
<p>New York gets the guy Enes Kanter apparently made into the player he is today. So says Harrellson.</p>
<p><strong>MINNESOTA:</strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong> Meets Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>2. <strong>Derrick Williams</strong></p>
<p>Traded Jonny Flynn for Houston&#8217;s 23rd pick, Nikola Mirotic, and Brad Miller.</p>
<p>For some reason the T-Wolves don&#8217;t end up with the 23d pick, so it&#8217;s basically a Flynn for Miller deal. Not sure why they&#8217;d do that.</p>
<p>Keeping Williams is the right move even though he doubles up on Beasley&#8217;s skills. He should be better than Bealsey and should give the Wolves some star power.</p>
<p><strong>UTAH: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Meets Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>3. <strong>Enes Kanter<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">12. </span>Alec Burks </strong></p>
<p>Although a lot of people had Brandon Knight going to Utah for the months leading up to the draft, they apparently changed their mind with less than a week to go. And while I was a little missed he didn&#8217;t fall to the Raptors, I think Utah will be VERY happy they chose Kanter instead of Knight.</p>
<p>Of course, while I think they made the right decision at 3, passing up Leonard, who is probably exactly what the Jazz need, is probably going to</p>
<p><strong>OKLAHOMA CITY: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Meets Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>27. <strong>Reggie Jackson</strong></p>
<p>Jackson is a combo guard who joins an already crowded Thunder backcourt. I really don&#8217;t know where he&#8217;ll find minutes. I wonder why Oklahoma didn&#8217;t simply trade out of the draft.</p>
<p><strong>PORTLAND: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Meets Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>21. <strong>Nolan Smith</strong><br />
51. <strong>Jon Diebler</strong></p>
<p>Traded Andre Miller for Raymond Felton</p>
<p>Traded Rudy Fernandez to Dallas for 26th pick, which they gave to Denver in prearranged deal.</p>
<p>Getting Felton for Miller is a great deal for Portland. He might be the young point guard they&#8217;ve been looking for all these years.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, picking Nolan Smith over Faried, who they could really use, was a mistake.</p>
<p><strong>ORLANDO: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Meets Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>53. <strong>DeAndre Liggins</strong></p>
<p>He&#8217;s a player that was on Kentucky, but now he&#8217;s not.</p>
<p><strong>ATLANTA: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Meets Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>48. <strong>Keith Benson</strong></p>
<p>He&#8217;s got legit size for an NBA power forward, and he&#8217;s stronger than he looks. For the 48th pick, the Hawks did well.</p>
<p>For a team hitting their ceiling, I would have liked to have seen them a little more active. Maybe after the new CBA is signed, whenever that happens.</p>
<p><strong>MIAMI: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Approaching Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>28. <strong>Norris Cole</strong></p>
<p>Somehow got the 28th pick from Chicago to draft Cole, a PG, who should provide insurance in case Bibby is not re-upped.</p>
<p><strong>BOSTON: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Approaching  Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>27. <strong>JuJuan Johnson<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">55. </span>E&#8217;Twaun Moore </strong></p>
<p>Traded their 25th pick for the 27th pick.</p>
<p>Johnson is a decent player, but I don&#8217;t see him making any impact on the Celtics, either now or down the line. But would anyone else have?</p>
<p>Moore is an undersized shooting guard, but I&#8217;m guessing what attracted Boston was the ability to tell people they drafted JuJuan and E&#8217;Twaun. And both are American.</p>
<p><strong>MILWAUKEE: </strong><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Approaching Expectations</span></strong></p>
<p>19. <strong>Tobias Harris</strong><br />
40. <strong>John Leuer</strong></p>
<p>Traded Corey Maggette and 10th pick for Stephen Jackson and Charlotte&#8217;s 19th pick, Tobias Harris.</p>
<p>Getting rid of Maggette, who was a disaster, is good, but is Jackson really what they need? And how much longer does he have? Harris is a good pick, though, who&#8217;s been compared to Shane Battier.</p>
<p><strong>PHOENIX: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Approaching  Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>13. <strong>Markieff Morris</strong></p>
<p>Morris might make a pretty good role player on a good team. Phoenix, however, needs home runs, not singles. They have a lot of role players and the engine that makes them go, Nash, is nearing the end of his career.</p>
<p><strong>GOLDEN STATE: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Approaching Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>11. <strong>Klay Thompson</strong><br />
37. <strong>Jeremy Tyler</strong><br />
44. <strong>Charles Jenkins</strong></p>
<p>So they STILL have Monta Ellis, yet decide to draft yet another shooter, while Kawhi Leonard  and Nikola Vucevic were still available. Thompson might be the best player available, for all I know, though, and if Jerry West thinks so, it&#8217;s probably true.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about Tyler, though, who seems to have the physical tools, but needs maturity.</p>
<p><strong>WASHINGTON: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Approaching Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>6. <strong>Jan Vesely</strong><br />
18.<strong>Chris Singleton<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">34. </span></strong><strong>Shelvin Mack </strong></p>
<p>A lot of teams seemed high on Vesley, but I don&#8217;t understand the attraction to him. He&#8217;s 6&#8217;11 and athletic, but he&#8217;s not a great scorer, can&#8217;t shoot, isn&#8217;t a good ball handler, will probably struggle defensively at the 3 and is a poor rebounder for his size. He&#8217;s apparently got a good motor, though, and he&#8217;s got a very hot girlfriend, so those are both pluses.</p>
<p>Singleton was on my don&#8217;t draft list and I really don&#8217;t see how he&#8217;s going to play with Vesley. Neither can shoot, but Singleton has even fewer skills than Vesley.</p>
<p><strong>NEW JERSEY: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Approaching Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>25. <strong>Marshon Brooks</strong><br />
36.<strong> Jordan Williams</strong></p>
<p>Traded their 27th pick, JaJuan Johnson for Boston&#8217;s 25th pick, Marshon Brooks</p>
<p>When I first saw a trade between Boston and New Jersey involving Brooks, I thought it was a blockbuster. No, it was not Brooks Lopez, but Marshon Brooks, who bring his great shooting and horrible defense to a bad defensive team.</p>
<p><strong>CLIPPERS: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Needs Improvement</strong></span></p>
<p>37. <strong>Trey Thompkins</strong><br />
47. <strong>Travis Leslie</strong></p>
<p>The Clippers traded away a unprotected lottery pick that ended up being Kyrie Irving, who&#8217;s probably just what the Clippers could have used to solidify them as one of the teams of the future. What they ended up drafting were two solid NCAA players with probably very little chance of sticking in the NBA.</p>
<p><strong>SACRAMENTO: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Needs Improvement</strong></span></p>
<p>10. <strong>Jimmer Fredette</strong><br />
35. <strong>Tyler Honeycutt</strong></p>
<p>Traded their 7th pick for Milwaukee&#8217;s 10th pick, Jimmer Fredette, and John Salmons</p>
<p>So, the Kings trade John Salmons away, only to trade back for him a couple of years later. And move down in the draft in order to do it. Fredette might be a great shooter, but I don&#8217;t see how he helps Sacramento. He&#8217;s not going to be a good defender and will do nothing for the chemistry. Keeping the pick and taking Knight or Walker would have been preferable.</p>
<p><strong>HOUSTON: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Needs Improvement</strong></span></p>
<p>14. <strong>Marcus Morris</strong><br />
38. <strong>Chandler Parsons</strong></p>
<p>Traded Brad Miller, the 23rd pick and a future first rounder for Minnesota&#8217;s 20th pick, <strong>Donatas Motiejunas</strong>, and Jonny Flynn.</p>
<p>Houston&#8217;s GM, Daryl Morey, intrigues me. He&#8217;s apparently a big advanced stats guy and was initially a guy a lot of Raptor fans wanted to replace Colangelo, but he makes the most head scratching trades. Motiejunas was another on my do not draft list. He doesn&#8217;t defend or rebound, but should be able to score a lot, which makes him basically a bigger version of Kevin Martin</p>
<p>Morris is, yet another young, decent power forward to join Houston&#8217;s stable of other decent, power forwards. Apparently you can never get enough of them.</p>
<p>Parsons is a typical Rocket small forward. he does a whole lot of things, but none of them really well.</p>
<p><strong>INDIANA: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Needs Improvement</strong></span></p>
<p>Traded their 15th pick, Kawhi Leonard, to the Spurs for George Hill</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t the Pacers already have enough PGs who aren&#8217;t really PGs? George Hill looked good in the Spurs system, but you need to watch out for those guys, because there&#8217;s a good chance he won&#8217;t look nearly as good out of it. And while the Pacers already have enough SFs, don&#8217;t they know not to trade a draft pick to the Spurs?</p>
<p><strong>NEW ORLEANS: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Incomplete</strong></span></p>
<p>Traded completely out of the draft by trading the 45th pick, Josh Harrellson, to the Knicks for cash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/06/2011-nba-draft-report-card/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trades, Trades and More Trades!</title>
		<link>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/02/trades-trades-and-more-trades/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/02/trades-trades-and-more-trades/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 08:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim W.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blazers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobcats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cavs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celtics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clippers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grizzlies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hornets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jazz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuggets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raptors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rockets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Wolves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thunder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wizards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/?p=1261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It says something about me that my three favourite times of the year, in the NBA, are the Playoffs, the Draft and just before the trade deadline. It&#8217;s like Christmas three times a year, but my bank account doesn&#8217;t get drained by it. Like my offseason grades, I&#8217;m going to look at each team and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It says something about me that my three favourite times of the year, in the NBA, are the Playoffs, the Draft and just before the trade deadline. It&#8217;s like Christmas three times a year, but my bank account doesn&#8217;t get drained by it.</p>
<p>Like my offseason grades, I&#8217;m going to look at each team and look at what they did as a whole, starting with the Raptors&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>TORONTO: Incomplete</strong></p>
<p><em>- James Johnson for Heat&#8217;s 2011 First Round Pick</em></p>
<p>For the Raptors, they didn&#8217;t make a big splash, but they did make one trade. Miami&#8217;s first round pick in the upcoming draft for James Johnson. To be honest, I was not a fan of Johnson coming out of Wake Forest. It didn&#8217;t instil me with confidence when both his name and Earl Clark&#8217;s were both mentioned as possibilities for the 9th pick that was eventually used to pick DeMar DeRozan. Both Johnson and Clark had fatal flaws that I turn me right off prospects. Things like &#8220;Low Basketball IQ&#8221;, or &#8220;Lack of Defensive Fundamentals&#8221; or worst of all, &#8220;Lack of Focus&#8221;. The &#8220;focus&#8221; issue is something that scares me off more than anything. This is actually something I&#8217;m going to discuss in a later post, but suffice is to say, I wasn&#8217;t a James Johnson fan.</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;m giving Toronto an incomplete grade on this for a couple of reasons. The first is that no one really knows what kind of player James Johnson is. Yes, I know he played well in his Raptor debut against his old team, the Bulls, but that was one game. Let&#8217;s see how he does for the remaining 24 before we make any judgements.</p>
<p>The other reason they get an incomplete is because we really don&#8217;t know whether this draft is going to be as bad as people seem to think it is going to be. And that&#8217;s not just the players, but the value of the draft picks. Right now, it seems draft picks for the upcoming draft are being given away like Carmelo Anthony Nugget jerseys. Personally, I would have liked to see if the Heat pick could have been packaged to move up in the draft, or to try and draft a sleeper. Still, I don&#8217;t dislike the trade because the Heat&#8217;s pick looks like it&#8217;s going to be around 27, and the chances of finding a quality player that far down is extremely slim, especially if this draft is as bad as people say.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll say this, if Johnson continues to play like he did in his debut, then this trade is a home run. He showed everything the Raptors lack, and he&#8217;ll be given every chance.</p>
<p><strong>OKLAHOMA CITY: Exceeds Expectations</strong></p>
<p><em>- Kendrick Perkins and Nate Robinson for Jeff Green and Nenad Krstic</em></p>
<p><em></em><em>- Nazr Mohommed for Morris Peterson and D.J. White </em></p>
<p>This past summer, I<a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2010/09/grading-the-offseason-17-10/"> gave the Thunder a &#8220;Meets Expectations&#8221; grade</a> because, while they made some good moves, they failed to fill the hole in the middle. With the only good defensive player in the middle being Serge Ibaka, and Cole Aldrich looking like a potential bust, the Thunder desperately needed another good big man. I suggested, before the New Year, <a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2010/12/top-5-trades-that-need-to-happen-in-201/">trading Jeff Green, Aldrich and a 1st round pick to Cleveland for Anderson Varejao</a>, but Varejao&#8217;s season ending injury pretty much killed that possibility. Instead of Varejao, they went out and got Kendrick Perkins.</p>
<p>Am I the only one who thinks this might shift the balance of power in the West?</p>
<p>Oklahoma&#8217;s biggest weakness this year has been their defense. They can score, but with Green and Krstic as their starting front court, they had trouble stopping people.</p>
<p>Now they have one of the best defensive centers in the league, in Perkins, and one of the best up and coming defensive big men in the league, in Ibaka. While they still lack a true low post scoring threat, a fact that might haunt them come the playoffs, this could be the move that launches them from pretender to true contender. Especially in the West where San Antonio and the Lakers are the two teams you have to go through. Now oklahoma can match their size.</p>
<p>And then they grabbed Nazr Mohammed as Perkins&#8217; backup. Yes, Nazr is vastly overpaid, but it&#8217;s expiring, so it doesn&#8217;t matter.</p>
<p>The only question is whether or not Perkins is healthy. If he is, then Oklahoma made out the best of anyone.</p>
<p><strong>DENVER: Exceeds Expectations</strong></p>
<p><em>- </em><em>Danilo Gallinari, </em><em>Wilson Chandler, </em><em>Raymond Felton, </em><em>Timofey Mozgov, </em><em>Kosta Koufos, K</em><em>nicks first-round pick (2014 or later) and the </em><em>Warriors&#8217; second-round picks in 2012 and 2013 for Carmelo Anthony, </em><em>Chauncey Billups, </em><em>Shelden Williams, </em><em>Renaldo Balkman and </em><em>Anthony Carter</em></p>
<p><a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/02/carmelo-the-fallout-and-why-i-hate-the-all-star-game-2/">I already discussed this deal</a>, but I&#8217;ll just say that with their back against the wall and everyone knowing where Carmelo would eventually go, Denver did very well. I thought they had secured 2 first round picks, but apparently not. Still staying out of this year&#8217;s draft probably isn&#8217;t such a bad thing. They got some nice young talent they can eventually flip for something, or try and develop themselves. Either way, they&#8217;ve got a lot of choices, now. And they&#8217;ll probably still compete for a playoff spot with the talent they have.</p>
<p><strong>NEW JERSEY: Exceeds Expectations</strong></p>
<p><em>- Deron Williams for </em><em>Devin Harris, </em><em>Derrick Favors and t</em><em>wo 2011 first-round picks</em></p>
<p><em></em><em>- </em><em>Brandan Wright and </em><em>Dan Gadzuric for Troy Murphy and Net&#8217;s 2112 second-round pick</em></p>
<p>No deal has ever surprised me like Deron Williams going to the Nets. In this day and age, where everyone seems to know everything, that one came out of left field. And without any warning. Personally, I think Deron might be a better player than Anthony, but either way, I think he&#8217;s going to help the team more than Anthony ever could. He makes his teammates better and should be able to attract some talent to the Nets, something they failed to do this past summer.</p>
<p>Getting Williams was certainly a risk. Favors could blow up to be a great player and they gave up their lottery pick in the upcoming draft, which apparently has no protection, plus Golden State&#8217;s protected pick next year. Plus, Williams might just leave in a year and a half. But I doubt it.</p>
<p>And getting something for Troy Murphy was pretty good. Wright can&#8217;t seem to stay healthy, but there was a time when he held a lot of promise. New Jersey can afford to gamble on him.</p>
<p><strong>HOUSTON: Exceeds Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Hasheem Thabeet, DeMarre Carroll and Memphis&#8217; first-round pick for Shane Battier and Ishmael Smith</em></p>
<p><em>- Goran Dragic and Phoenix&#8217;s protected first-round pick for Aaron Brooks</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been a fan of Battier since his days at Duke, and would love him to eventually go to a real contender, where he deserves, but Houston was not going to make the playoffs, and he probably wasn&#8217;t going to return as a free agent this summer. Getting a project like Thabeet is a low risk gamble that could pay off big, especially if he fulfills the expectations that made him a 2nd pick.</p>
<p>Brooks, on the other hand, is the type of PG I dislike. He&#8217;s a shoot first PG that makes his teammates grumble with his shot selection and unwillingness to pass. Yes, he can score, but I like my PGs to make everyone else better, and Brooks doesn&#8217;t do that.</p>
<p>Plus, they got a couple of first round picks. Not a bad days work.</p>
<p><strong>PORTLAND: Meets Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Gerald Wallace for </em><em>Joel Przybilla, </em><em>Dante Cunningham, </em><em>Sean Marks and t</em><em>wo first-round draft picks</em></p>
<p>Portland got exceptionally better, and gave up very little. Wallace can play PF and give them a small lineup that can still rebound, or play SF and give them a big lineup. With Roy still a question mark, getting a guy like Wallace, who can score, rebound and defend, was important. Plus, he&#8217;s only 28 despite being the league 9 years.</p>
<p><strong>CLIPPERS: Meets Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Mo Williams and Jamario Moon for Baron Davis and the Clipper&#8217;s 2011 first-round pick</em></p>
<p>Another surprise, since Baron Davis had been playing fairly well recently. Of course, the smart GM would use that opportunity to trade him. Who knew the Clippers had a smart GM?</p>
<p>One of the worst things the Clippers have done in the last decade (and there&#8217;s been a lot to choose from) might have been giving Davis that huge contract. In 11 seasons in the NBA, Davis has had exactly one exceptional season where he was completely healthy. The season before the Clippers signed him away from Golden State.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never been a fan of Mo Williams but if it&#8217;s a choice between him for 3 more years at $8.5 million and Baron Davis for 3 more years at $14 million, I&#8217;m going to choose Mo every time. And while giving up a lottery pick might seem like a steep price to get rid of Davis, the last thing the Clippers need right now is another young player, and no one&#8217;s liking the look of this draft, so it might end up being worthless, anyway.</p>
<p><strong>ATLANTA: Meets Expectation</strong>s</p>
<p>- <em>Kirk Hinrich and Hilton Armstrong for Mike Bibby, Maurice Evans, Jordan Crawford and Atlanta&#8217;s 2011 first-round pick</em></p>
<p>I thought trading for Bibby a few years ago was fantastic for the Hawks. They desperately needed a veteran PG and Bibby had been in the playoff trenches. But he&#8217;s not the player he once was, and his defense is now pretty much non existent. Hinrich is a massive upgrade, and is an excellent defense. Plus, like Bibby, he doesn&#8217;t need the ball to be effective, which is important playing next to Joe Johnson.</p>
<p><strong>NEW YORK: Meets Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Carmelo Anthony, </em><em>Chauncey Billups,</em><em>Shelden Williams, </em><em>Renaldo Balkman and </em><em>Anthony Carter</em> for <em>Danilo Gallinari, </em><em>Wilson Chandler, </em><em>Raymond Felton, </em><em>Timofey Mozgov, </em><em>Kosta Koufos, K</em><em>nicks first-round pick (2014 or later) and the </em><em>Warriors&#8217; second-round picks in 2012 and 2013</em></p>
<p>As I said, <a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/02/carmelo-the-fallout-and-why-i-hate-the-all-star-game-2/">I already discussed this deal</a>, and New York obviously came out of the trade with the best player, but I&#8217;m not convinced New York is ever going to be a serious contender with Anthony and Amare.</p>
<p><strong>NEW ORLEANS: Meets Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Carl Landry for Marcus Thornton</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a big fan of either of these guys, but Thornton wasn&#8217;t getting any time because he apparently doesn&#8217;t play defense, and New Orleans is sorely lacking inside scoring. Enter Landry, who doesn&#8217;t rebound and isn&#8217;t a great defender, but can score inside.</p>
<p><strong>CHICAGO: Meets Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Miami&#8217;s 2011 first-round pick for James Johnson</em></p>
<p>Johnson was obviously not going to break into the Bulls&#8217; lineup, so getting a first round pick was probably the best thing they could have done.</p>
<p><strong>MEMPHIS: Approaching Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em><em>Shane Battier and Ishmael Smith for <em><em>Hasheem Thabeet, DeMarre Carroll and Memphis&#8217; first-round pick</em></em></em></em></p>
<p>Giving up Thabeet and a first-round pick was a big gamble for a player who might not eve re-sign with Memphis this summer, but Battier is exactly the type of player they need. A steady, smart veteran who doesn&#8217;t need the ball to be effective and who knows how to win. Memphis obviously hopes he&#8217;ll rub off on everyone else on the team.</p>
<p>I still think they should have traded Zach Randolph while his stock was so high.</p>
<p><strong>BOSTON: Approaching Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em><em>Jeff Green and Nenad Krstic</em><span style="font-style: normal;"> for </span></em><em><em>Kendrick Perkins and Nate Robinson</em></em></p>
<p><em><em>- Sacramento&#8217;s second-round pick for </em></em><em><em>Marquis Daniels</em></em></p>
<p><em><em>- Cleveland&#8217;s second-round pick for </em>Semih Erden and L</em><em>uke Harangody</em></p>
<p>When Kendrick Perkins got injured a couple of seasons ago in the playoffs, it cost the Celtics the title. He might be one of the best centers in the league at defending Dwight Howard. Trading away a very good defensive center in his prime is a huge, huge risk. One I think might come back to haunt the Celtics.</p>
<p>I like Jeff Green, and I think not being forced to play PF will do him a world of good, and I think he&#8217;s a very good defender at the SF position, but basically the Celtics gave up a starter for a bench player. They are going to have to rely on Shaq a lot more at center, and this quote from Doc Rivers doesn&#8217;t do a lot for me: &#8221;Shaq&#8217;s a key component of this,&#8221; said Rivers. &#8220;We need to get Shaq healthy and Shaq will be healthy. If Shaq plays great, this deal was actually really good for us. That&#8217;s on Shaq. We have to get Shaq in great shape, get him ready, get him healthy. He&#8217;s really going to be important for us in the playoffs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Plus, the Celtics are going to have two players (Shaq and Rondo) who can&#8217;t hit free throws. You don&#8217;t think that might hurt them?</p>
<p><strong>SACRAMENTO: Approaching Expectations</strong></p>
<p><em>- Marcus Thornton for Carl Landry</em></p>
<p><em>- Marquis Daniels for a second-round pick</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not quite sure why Sacramento would want Thornton or Daniels, since they already have Evans Casspi and Garcia, but I guess they didn&#8217;t give up much, so why not.</p>
<p><strong>MINNESOTA: Approaching Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Anthony Randolph and Eddy Curry for Corey Brewer</em></p>
<p>Yes, Minnesota is acquiring assets, but Corey Brewer is more productive than Anthony Randolph, and Minnesota agreed to take on Eddy Curry to get him. Randolph better end up panning out.</p>
<p><strong>WASHINGTON: Approaching Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Mike Bibby, Maurice Evans, Jordan Crawford and Atlanta&#8217;s 2011 first-round pick for Kirk Hinrich and Hilton Armstrong</em></p>
<p>I find it hard to believe that the best Washington could have gotten for Hinrich was Mike Bibby and another year of his contract and a late first-round pick in a bad draft. It&#8217;s not bad, but I wouldn&#8217;t say it was good, either.</p>
<p><strong>CLEVELAND: WHY??????</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Baron Davis  and the Clippers 2011 first-round pick for Mo Williams and Jamario Moon</em></p>
<p><em>- <em>Semih Erden and L</em><em>uke Harangody for a second-round pick</em></em></p>
<p>I can understand wanting to get the Clippers first round pick (probably a top 10 pick), but is it really worth taking on Baron Davis when you couldn&#8217;t even get rid of Antoine Jamison and his awful contract?</p>
<p><strong>PHOENIX: Your Kid Is A Moron</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Aaron Brooks for Goran Dragic and Phoenix&#8217;s protected first-round pick</em></p>
<p>I have absolutely no idea what Phoenix is doing. Brooks is a brutal PG because he can&#8217;t pass, so he&#8217;s the anti-Nash. And they gave up a first round pick when they should be collecting them.</p>
<p><strong>UTAH: Incomplete</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Devin Harris, </em><em>Derrick Favors and t</em><em>wo 2011 first-round picks</em> for <em>Deron Williams</em></p>
<p>As I previously said, this trade came out of nowhere, and I&#8217;m not quite sure how I feel about it from Utah&#8217;s perspective. If Williams was indeed on his way out of town, as some have said, then trading him now was a fantastic idea. And getting what they did for him was very good. Personally, I liked the Nets offer for Carmelo better than the Knicks, and the Jazz ended up getting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/02/trades-trades-and-more-trades/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My All-Stars And Other Stories&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/02/my-all-stars-and-other-stories/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/02/my-all-stars-and-other-stories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim W.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blazers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cavs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celtics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clippers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grizzlies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jazz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mavericks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuggets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raptors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Wolves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thunder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Proposals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warriors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/?p=1249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick post with the All-Star reserves being announced later today. The Rookies and Sophomores were announced and while DeMar DeRozan was selected, Ed Davis was not.  Was Davis deserving? Sure, but  wouldn&#8217;t call it a snub. Favors, who got in over Davis, has similar numbers and with the Nets not having anyone with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick post with the All-Star reserves being announced later today.</p>
<p>The Rookies and Sophomores were announced and while DeMar DeRozan was selected, Ed Davis was not.  Was Davis deserving? Sure, but  wouldn&#8217;t call it a snub. Favors, who got in over Davis, has similar numbers and with the Nets not having anyone with any chance to make the team, I&#8217;m guessing the NBA wanted them to have some presence. It&#8217;s likely Davis will replace Blake Griffin, anyway, since most feel Griffin is going to be playing in the big game.</p>
<p>As for the real All-Stars, here would be my selections:</p>
<p><strong>WEST</strong></p>
<p>Guards:</p>
<p>Like other years in the West, there are more All-Stars than spots available for the All-Star game. Guys who probably should make it, but don&#8217;t really have a shot, like Steve Nash and Tony Parker, would probably make it in the East.</p>
<p><strong>Manu Ginobili</strong></p>
<p>The best player on the best team in the league. Yes, Tim Duncan may be still the franchise player, but Ginobili is the guy who carries this team and he&#8217;s having a career year now that he&#8217;s finally injury free. The reason the Spurs are my favourite to win the title is partly because of this guy. No one gets better at crunch time than him. No one.</p>
<p><strong>Deron Williams</strong></p>
<p>Deron deserves a better team than he is surrounded by at the moment, and Utah&#8217;s high level mediocrity is not his fault. Without him, this team wouldn&#8217;t have a shot at the playoffs.</p>
<p>Forwards:</p>
<p>Someone deserving is going to get left off, and, like the guard position snubs, at least one of them would probably make it if he had this season in the East.</p>
<p><strong>Dirk Nowitzki</strong></p>
<p>Before he went down with injury, Dallas was the second best team in the league. Without him, they were 2-7. It&#8217;s not hard to do the math on that one. Nowitzki will never be the defensive force that most Hall of Fame big men are, and because of that probably won&#8217;t ever lead Dallas to a Championship (Dallas has underperformed consistently in the playoffs with him), but there&#8217;s no doubt this team is far, far much better because of him.</p>
<p><strong>Blake Griffin</strong></p>
<p>Blake Griffin very well might be having the best rookie season since Tim Duncan. He&#8217;s 12th in scoring, 4th in rebounding and even dishing a very good 3.6 assists per game, 3rd among ALL big men (PFs and centers) in the league. And he&#8217;s getting better every month. Plus, he&#8217;s actually helping the Clippers not suck, which is enough to get my vote. Still, if he wants to become truly great, he&#8217;s going to have to vastly improve his defense because right now he makes Amare Stoudemire look like Bill Russell.</p>
<p>Center:</p>
<p>Remember when the West had Shaq in his prime and David Robinson and Hakeem Olajuwon still playing very high level basketball? Now, in order to find a healthy, All-Star worthy center, you have to use the David Stern added rule that you can pick someone who ALSO plays center.</p>
<p><strong>Pau Gasol</strong></p>
<p>Gasol has struggled this year, partly due to an increased workload, but he&#8217;s still been one of the main reasons why the Lakers, despite their struggles, are still number 2 in the West.</p>
<p>Wildcards:</p>
<p><strong>Kevin Love</strong></p>
<p>He scores 21.4 ppg and grabs a monstrous 15.5 rpg despite taking 148 shots from beyond the arc and being 10th in the league in 3 point percentage. Oh, and he&#8217;s one of the top passers at his position. Sure, he plays for the basement dwelling T-Wolves, but <a  href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2OkK2jupU8" target="_blank">as his video tells us</a>, he&#8217;s got the numbers</p>
<p><strong>Russell Westbrook</strong></p>
<p>Some thought he was Oklahoma&#8217;s MVP in the early part of the season, and he&#8217;s shown some kinks in his armour (why is a PG who shoots 43% from the field taking 17 shots per game), but he&#8217;s still helped Oklahoma move up to the fourth seed in the West.</p>
<p>Who I left off:</p>
<p>Obviously I&#8217;ve left off some very good players. Tim Duncan was probably the most difficult omission, since he plays on the best team in the league, right now, but does anyone really think he&#8217;s not going to be selected to replace Yao?</p>
<p>Tony Parker and Steve Nash I already mentioned, and it&#8217;s a shame they won&#8217;t make it because they are having All-Star seasons. There just simply isn&#8217;t room.</p>
<p>Another guy I&#8217;d love to include, but can&#8217;t, is LaMarcus Aldridge. He&#8217;s carries the Blazers since Roy went down and if he had played like he has in January for the entire season, I&#8217;d be tempted to include him. Still, he&#8217;s quietly becoming one of the best PFs in the league.</p>
<p>I know Monta Ellis and Zach Randolph put up great numbers, and I included Kevin Love because of his great stats, but I simply can&#8217;t see either player ever being a major contributor for a contender. These are prototypical good players on bad teams.</p>
<p><strong>EAST</strong></p>
<p>Guards:</p>
<p>The guard position is very much like the Center position in the West. Obviously not as glaring, but still not exactly strong.</p>
<p><strong>Rajon Rondo</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing how much he&#8217;s improved since he was drafted. His lack of jumpshot might very well be the Celtic&#8217;s Achilles heal, but he&#8217;s still managed to shoot over 50% from the field, so he&#8217;s not exactly hurting the team much.</p>
<p><strong>Ray Allen</strong></p>
<p>He&#8217;s having his best season as a Celtic and looking nothing like the creaky, aging player that sometimes looked like he might not have a lot left in the tank the last year or two. I don&#8217;t know what the Celtics are giving him, but I want some.</p>
<p>Forwards:</p>
<p><strong>Kevin Garnett</strong></p>
<p>Back when Garnett went down with injury, in 2008, I was adamant that the Celtics were hiding the seriousness of the injury. They never satisfactorily explained the injury or commented how long he&#8217;d be out. The deeper the Celtics got in the playoffs, the more fishy it looked that he didn&#8217;t look like he was trying to return. Honestly, after that, I figured his career was pretty much done. Especially after the start last year. But whatever the Celtics are giving to Allen, they must also be giving to Garnett because he looks fully recovered.</p>
<p><strong>Chris Bosh</strong></p>
<p>Remember when everyone thought Chris Bosh was the problem in Miami during their horrible start? No one has any harsh words to say about him now (well, except for some Raptor fans). He&#8217;s not the best player on the Heat, but he&#8217;s just as important as Wade and LeBron to their success.</p>
<p>Center:</p>
<p>A lot has changed in the East at the center position when Jamaal Magloire made the All Star team for the sole fact that he was the best player at a position that didn&#8217;t include many good players.While the position is not exactly teeming with All-Star worthy players, with guys like Horford, Noah, Bogut and Lopez, the East looks like it won&#8217;t have any trouble filling the position any time soon.</p>
<p><strong>Al Horford</strong></p>
<p>Joe Johnson is the team&#8217;s leading scorer, but I think Horford has become the team&#8217;s best player. When Johnson went down, the team barely faltered, but they lost Horford, I think they&#8217;d be in trouble. He&#8217;s not a great scorer, but he can score if needed, and he really doesn&#8217;t have a weakness.</p>
<p>Wildcards:</p>
<p><strong>Paul Pierce</strong></p>
<p>The main reason the Celtics didn&#8217;t falter when Rondo went down was Paul Pierce played like an MVP. Like his other veteran stars, he&#8217;s getting old, but he&#8217;s proven he&#8217;s still got a couple of good years left, at least.</p>
<p><strong>Carlos Boozer</strong></p>
<p>The selection I&#8217;m least happy about. Noah is the second best player on Chicago, but because he&#8217;s injured, he&#8217;s out. I could easily be swayed to select Joe Johnson, instead, but Boozer had a big impact on Chicago, so he sneaks by. He&#8217;s still not a good defensive player, but he&#8217;s decent enough that he&#8217;s not a liability on that end.</p>
<p>Who I left off:</p>
<p>Obviously Joe Johnson was the hardest cut. And I&#8217;m not thrilled about having FOUR Celtics, no matter how good the team is. San Antonio only has three and they have the best record in the league. The truth is, though, that all four Celtic All-Stars are deserving.</p>
<p>Joakim Noah will be a perennial All-Star when he&#8217;s healthy, and his injury is the only thing that prevented his inclusion.</p>
<p>Andrew Bogut might end up being a perennial snub since both Noah and Horford should probably always be ahead of him. He&#8217;s still a very good player and would probably be an All-Star in the West, at center.</p>
<p>Josh Smith again misses out on the cut. Good, but not good enough.</p>
<p>&#8212;-</p>
<p>My end of the year post, which <a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2010/12/top-5-trades-that-need-to-happen-in-201/" target="_blank">detailed 5 trades that needed to happen in 2011</a>, may not have been so far out, after all. A few weeks after I posted that column, and not long after Anderson Varejao ended his season with an injury, it came out that Oklahoma was in discussions with Cleveland to try and get&#8230;you guessed it, Anderson Varejao.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>Speaking of my trades that need to happen, the Nets have pulled out and I think it&#8217;s probably the best thing for them. Carmelo has never proven to be enough of a difference maker to want to dismantle your team to get him. He&#8217;d certainly be a nice player if they can sign him, but if I were the Nets, I wouldn&#8217;t try and hit a home run with a kid&#8217;s bat (that&#8217;s the only analogy I could think of). Especially if the deal includes the aging Richard Hamilton and Chauncey Billups, who are still good, but aren&#8217;t going to get the Nets to the promised land.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>One more thing about Andrea Bargnani after last week&#8217;s column. Kevin Love, who is averaging 15.5 rpg has taken 3 fewer three point shots, while shooting a much higher percentage, than Andrea, this season. So much for the excuse that Bargnani doesn&#8217;t grab as many rebounds because he takes so many threes. Obviously Kevin Love doesn&#8217;t listen to excuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/02/my-all-stars-and-other-stories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 5 Trades That Need To Happen in 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2010/12/top-5-trades-that-need-to-happen-in-201/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2010/12/top-5-trades-that-need-to-happen-in-201/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 08:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim W.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[76ers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cavs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuggets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raptors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Wolves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thunder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Proposals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/?p=1202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With 2010 pretty much done, apparently it&#8217;s customary to do some sort of top 10 list. So I can keep my blogger&#8217;s license, here&#8217;s mine. I&#8217;ve decided to come up with 5 deals that I think should happen, for various reasons. I was going to do ten, but couldn&#8217;t think of that many. All these deals do work, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With 2010 pretty much done, apparently it&#8217;s customary to do some sort of top 10 list. So I can keep my blogger&#8217;s license, here&#8217;s mine. I&#8217;ve decided to come up with 5 deals that I think should happen, for various reasons. I was going to do ten, but couldn&#8217;t think of that many. All these deals do work, but a couple would have to wait until February, due to CBA rules.</p>
<p><strong>5. Carmelo Anthony to the Nets</strong></p>
<p>First of all, I&#8217;m sick to death of reading about it. Enough already. Let&#8217;s just get it over with.</p>
<p>Also, it makes sense for everyone involved.</p>
<p>No one can give Denver a better package back for Anthony. Derrick Favors, a couple of first rounders and an expiring contract (Troy Murphy) would kick start Denver&#8217;s rebuilding process and give them way more in return than Toronto or Cleveland got for their outgoing franchise players. Denver isn&#8217;t going anywhere with him. The only time they got past the 1st round was when they traded for Billups and now he&#8217;s too old to lead them anywhere. Unless they want to become the Atlanta Hawks of the West, trading Anthony is the best thing for them.</p>
<p>You had to feel a bit bad for the Nets this summer. They went through a nearly historically bad season just so they would be able to have the cap room to make a splash in the offseason, and came up with Travis Outlaw, despite a flashy new owner who wants to become New Jersey&#8217;s (and Russia&#8217;s) answer to Mark Cuban and their front office putting on a full court press trying to sign one or two of the big names. And they had to overpay Travis Outlaw. They deserve SOMETHING for all their troubles.</p>
<p>Carmelo wants to go to the Knicks, but there a a couple of problems with that. The first is that the Knicks can&#8217;t match what New Jersey can send back without hurting their roster. And with Carmelo not being a stellar defender himself, going to a team and coach not exactly known for their defense, wouldn&#8217;t be a recipe for success.</p>
<p>And if Carmelo simply waits for the offseason, he&#8217;ll probably lose out on a lot of money with the new CBA.</p>
<p>The Nets have a top 10 center, and good PG, a well-respected coached, some nice roll players and an owner willing to spend money. Sure, they&#8217;re stuck in New Jersey for another year and a half, but then they&#8217;ll be in Brooklyn. And they&#8217;re a playoff team with him. If I&#8217;m Denver, I&#8217;d try and get Al Harrington thrown in there, as well. <a  href="http://www.realgm.com/src_checktrade.php?tradeid=5792754" target="_blank">Even if it means taking Travis Outlaw back</a>.</p>
<p><strong>4. Jeff Green, Cole Aldrich and a 1st round pick for Anderson Varejao</strong></p>
<p>Cleveland needs to rebuild. Maybe they don&#8217;t know it, yet, but losing 15 of your last 16 games should tell you something. Varejao is 28 years old and really should not be in Cleveland&#8217;s longterm plans. He&#8217;s played very well in a bad situation and is probably the player the Cavs can get the more for, right now.</p>
<p>Jeff Green is only 24 and would be a great deal if he would agree to sign an extension. He&#8217;s a solid<br />
citizen, a talented player and would be a good piece for the future. Cole Aldrich hasn&#8217;t performed up to expectations, so far, but is a defensive 7 footer, something the Cavs don&#8217;t have, and is still a rookie. Getting another 1st rounder would be another important piece to a rebuilding team.</p>
<p>Oklahoma was supposed to take the next step this year and become a contender, but while they&#8217;ve played well, their weak front court is holding them back, as well as their interior defense. That&#8217;s why they drafted Cole Aldrich, but he&#8217;s struggled and might be a couple of years away from being a good center, of at all. Varejao isn&#8217;t a true center, but he&#8217;s performed well as one for Cleveland this year, and would solidify the Thunder&#8217;s frontline defensively. Jeff Green is a very good SF, unfortunately on Oklahoma he plays PF. And he&#8217;s a luxury they can&#8217;t really afford, which is why he hasn&#8217;t been extended. It&#8217;s a steep price to pay for a PF who doesn&#8217;t score, but Varejao would make the Thunder a better team and a real contender.</p>
<p><strong>3. Steve Nash, Grant Hill and Channing Frye for Marvin Williams, Jamal Crawford and a 1st round pick</strong></p>
<p>Does anyone really want to see Steve Nash finish his career on a team that has no hope of ever contending? He deserves better than that and the NBA deserves better than that. He&#8217;ll never demand a trade, but Phoenix should do him a favour and give him one.</p>
<p>Same goes for Grant Hill, but to a lesser degree. Nash is Hill&#8217;s fountain of youth and it would be a shame to trade Nash to a contender but not Hill. And Channing Frye owes Nash his career, and performs well with him.</p>
<p>Marvin Williams has never lived up to being drafted ahead of Chris Paul and Deron Williams, but he&#8217;s a 24 year old, athletic SF who has a lot of talent and a high basketball IQ. He could end up flourishing in a new situation.</p>
<p>Jamal Crawford would be an expiring contract and will help lessen Phoenix salary demands while they rebuild.</p>
<p>Adding Steve Nash to Atlanta&#8217;s athletic lineup would be huge and might make them capable of getting to the Conference Finals. Yes, it&#8217;s a gamble to add a guy who turns 37 in a month (as well as a guy who just turned 38), but right now Atlanta&#8217;s ceiling is the second round and that&#8217;s it. If they want to really compete for a Championship, this may be the best chance.</p>
<p><strong>2. </strong><strong>Jason Richardson, Jameer Nelson, and Brandon Bass for Andre </strong><strong>Iguodala, Elton Brand and Marreese Speights</strong></p>
<p>If Orlando really is going for broke, they might as well go all the way. A starting lineup of Dwight Howard, Elton Brand, Hedo Turkoglu, Andre Iguodala and Gilbert Arenas would have a total salary higher than all but 7 entire teams. And Turkoglu&#8217;s salary would would be the smallest.</p>
<p>Plus, I&#8217;d love to see how this team does. In Sports Guy terminology, this would be like putting Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt, Will Smith, Leonardo DiCaprio and Jim Carrey in a movie together. Sure, they&#8217;re all expensive as hell and a couple of them are past their prime, but you&#8217;d want to see it, wouldn&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>Philadelphia probably would do it in a second, too.</p>
<p><strong>1. Andrea Bargnani for Darko Milicic and the rights to Ricky Rubio</strong></p>
<p>Come on, anyone who reads this blog on a semi-regular basis can&#8217;t be surprised about this one. Andrea Bargnani is having a great year and is scoring a ton of points, but he&#8217;s also one of the worst defending centers in the entire league and just about every advanced statistic shows he is actually a liability to the team despite his scoring. And if you don&#8217;t believe in advanced statistics, you just need to watch him.</p>
<p>Ricky Rubio is a completely unproven talent that very well might be the second coming of Bobby Hurley. He also possesses a skills that might make him a transcendent PG similar to Steve Nash. The guy has been a winner wherever he&#8217;s played, has an otherworldly basketball IQ and just turned 20 in October.</p>
<p>While Darko will never live up to his draft position, he&#8217;s actually become a serviceable center this year. He may not be the ideal long term solution, but he defends, rebounds and scores and will certainly do nicely until something better comes along or until either Ed Davis gains 35 pounds or Solomon Alabi becomes an NBA player. And gains 35 pounds.</p>
<p>For Minnesota, they&#8217;ve been holding out for Rubio to come since they drafted him, and this is year two. They say they are confident in Rubio finally signing with them this summer, but if if there&#8217;s a lockout, that might put a crimp in their plans. First, if they don&#8217;t sign Rubio after three years since he was drafted, he can demand to be paid more than the rookie scale. And does anyone really expect Rubio to play for Minnesota?</p>
<p>Getting a high scoring big man to pair with their high rebounding big man, in Kevin Love, might be enough to pry Rubio away. Sure, they will have major problems defensively, but not everyone is such a stickler about that sort of thing. It&#8217;s usually only winning teams that worry about that, and Minnesota certainly aren&#8217;t that.</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s it. Happy New Year and thanks for reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2010/12/top-5-trades-that-need-to-happen-in-201/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

