<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Picket Fence &#187; Bulls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/category/teams/bulls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence</link>
	<description>A discussion about basketball.  More specifically the Raptors and the NBA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 19:00:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>2011 NBA Draft Report Card!</title>
		<link>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/06/2011-nba-draft-report-card/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/06/2011-nba-draft-report-card/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 07:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim W.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[76ers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blazers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobcats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cavs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celtics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clippers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grizzlies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hornets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jazz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mavericks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuggets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pistons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raptors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rockets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Wolves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thunder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warriors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wizards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/?p=1330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TORONTO: Exceeds Expectations 5. Jonas Valanciunas It&#8217;s deja vu all over again. Last year, a team above them unexpectedly took an athletic defensive power forward which resulted in a higher ranked big man unexpectedly falling to the Raptors. Colangelo and the Raptors brass probably can&#8217;t believe their luck. I was afraid they might still take Knight, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/boy_report_card_tough_spin_schoo_1188735.jpg" class="thickbox no_icon" rel="gallery-1330" title="boy_report_card_tough_spin_schoo_1188735"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1331" style="margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="boy_report_card_tough_spin_schoo_1188735" src="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/boy_report_card_tough_spin_schoo_1188735-300x214.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="214" /></a></p>
<p><strong>TORONTO: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>5. <strong>Jonas Valanciunas</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s deja vu all over again. Last year, a team above them unexpectedly took an athletic defensive power forward which resulted in a higher ranked big man unexpectedly falling to the Raptors. Colangelo and the Raptors brass probably can&#8217;t believe their luck. I was afraid they might still take Knight, but Colangelo showed he is indeed focused on the future, rather than the present.</p>
<p>Valanciunas will fill the void at center the Raptors have been lacking for, well, ever. While apparently a lot of Raptor fans are unhappy with the pick, I think they&#8217;ll eventually regret that as Valanciunas is the type of player that Raptor fans love. He&#8217;s a high energy player who hustles, defends and rebounds. English, though, is not his strong suit.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the pick they got from the Heat, which they traded to the Bulls for James Johnson, could have been used to pick Corey Joseph at 28, who went one spot later to the Spurs. Who knows if that&#8217;s who Colangelo would have picked, as he was projected to go in the second round, but I&#8217;ll certainly be comparing their careers. And since the Spurs are pretty much never wrong&#8230;</p>
<p>I would have liked to see them try and scoop up another pick, but it&#8217;s not a big deal that they didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p><strong>SAN ANTONIO: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>29. <strong>Cory Joseph</strong></p>
<p>Traded George Hill for Indiana&#8217;s 15th pick, <strong>Kawhi Leonard</strong>.</p>
<p>I assumed the Spurs would exceed expectations, and again they have. Trading for Leonard is huge, especially since he was projected to go in the top ten and dropped. He&#8217;s the type of defender than the Spurs love, is in the perfect situation, and should step in Bruce Bowen&#8217;s shoes, that have been empty for a few years.</p>
<p>If on of my sleepers, Toronto&#8217;s Cory Joseph couldn&#8217;t get drafted by the Raptors, then the Spurs would have been my second choice. And it&#8217;s incredible timing because they might have their replacement for Hill. Yes, he projected to go in the second round, but I think he has first round talent and so, apparently, do the Spurs.haunt them. Burks should be a decent player, but guys like him are a dime a dozen.</p>
<p><strong>CHARLOTTE: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>7. <strong>Bismack Biyombo</strong><br />
9. <strong>Kemba Walker </strong></p>
<p>Traded Stephen Jackson for Sacramento&#8217;s 7th pick and Corey Maggette.</p>
<p>Sold 39th pick, Jeremy Tyler to Golden State, I&#8217;m guessing for cash.</p>
<p>It hurts to say it, but Charlotte actually did well. I was surprised that they passed on Knight for Biyombo, as they&#8217;ve been looking for a real starting PG for, well, their entire existence, but they resisted temptation and went with a guy who I think will be better down the road. I also look forward to watching Biyombo and Tyrus Thomas being on the floor at the same time. The front row needs to watch out.</p>
<p>Maggette was a disaster in Milwaukee and now brings his brand of scoring and no defense to Charlotte. He&#8217;s probably going to lose games for them, but that&#8217;s kind of what they wanted, so maybe it&#8217;s a good thing?</p>
<p>Walker fell, but not as far as I thought he might. I think it&#8217;s still a pretty good pick at 9, but Charlotte seems to like picking decent PGs with little upside.</p>
<p><strong>CHICAGO: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>23. <strong>Nikola Mirotic</strong><br />
30. <strong>Jimmy Butler</strong></p>
<p>Traded 28th and 43rd picks for Houstons 23rd pick, Nikola Mirotic.</p>
<p>Butler was very efficient offensively at Butler, and is a very good defender, so the Bulls may have a sleeper on their hands.</p>
<p>How much do you think the Spurs are pissed at not getting Mirotic, who is exactly the type of player they usually scoop up at the end up the first round? He&#8217;s a huge steal, but will play overseas for a couple of more seasons. That&#8217;s fine with the Bulls.</p>
<p><strong>DENVER: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>22. <strong>Kenneth Faried</strong><br />
26. <strong>Jordan Hamilton<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">56. </span>Chukwudiebere Maduabum</strong></p>
<p>Traded Raymond Felton for Portland&#8217;s 26th pick, Jordan Hamilton, and Andre Miller.</p>
<p>Traded for Laker&#8217;s 56th pick, Chukwudiebere Maduabum, somehow.</p>
<p>Although I haven&#8217;t confirmed that Denver is, in fact, keeping Faried, if they do this was a very good draft day. I would have liked to have seen them get more for Felton, but Miller is a good, veteran PG that will probably be shipped elsewhere soon. Plus they were able to pick up another pick and a SF who has a chance to be a decent pro.</p>
<p>Faried is the type of player that everyone loves and helps you win. So why didn&#8217;t he go higher? Probably because he&#8217;s not a scorer and a little undersized.</p>
<p>I have no idea who Chukwudiebere Maduabum, but on his <a  href="http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Chu-Chu-Maduabum-6398/" target="_blank">Draft Express profile</a>, he&#8217;s listed as Chu Chu. I think he&#8217;s worthy of picking just for that. He immediately is in the running for best All-Tim NBA name.</p>
<p><strong>MEMPHIS: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>49. <strong>Josh Selby</strong></p>
<p>Selby was considered a first round talent, so this has to be considered a steal. Where they&#8217;ll find room for him, is another thing.<br />
<strong>DETROIT: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>8. <strong>Brandon Knight</strong><br />
33. <strong>Kyle Singler</strong><br />
52. <strong>Vernon Macklin</strong></p>
<p>Although I question whether he can play PG, Knight was projected to go in the top 5 and dropped to 8th, so Pistons fans have to be happy. Of course, he kind of presents the same problems that Rodney Stuckey, who&#8217;s also a combo guard they tried to turn into a point guard, did.</p>
<p>Singler is never going to be a star, but last year he was considered a middle first round pick and they got him in the second round. I think he&#8217;ll hang on and have a decent career as a bench player.</p>
<p><strong>DALLAS: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>Traded their 26th pick to Portland for Rudy Fernandez</p>
<p>The rich get richer. Dallas has no use for a rookie and no one picked there was going to help them like Fernandez. I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if he ends up starting next year.</p>
<p><strong>LAKERS: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>41.<strong> Darius Morris</strong><br />
46. <strong>Andrew Goodelock</strong><br />
58. <strong>Ater Majok</strong></p>
<p>Without a first round pick, they were able to pick up a decent prospect, in Darius Morris. This might be the second year in a row they get at least one keeper from the second round.</p>
<p><strong>PHILADELPHIA: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Exceeds Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>16. <strong>Nikola Vucevic</strong><br />
50. <strong>Lavoy Allen</strong></p>
<p>Vucevic should end up being a pretty good pro and probable starter. At 16, in this draft, that&#8217;s pretty damn good.</p>
<p><strong>CLEVELAND: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Meets Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>1.<strong> Kyrie Irving</strong><br />
4. <strong>Tristan Thompson<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">32.</span> Justin Harper </strong></p>
<p>Irving will probably be the best player, so it was no surprise he was the first pick.</p>
<p>Thompson was the first big surprise of the night. And while I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a bad pick, since I think Thompson is going to be a very good pro, but he was a big reach at 3. Valanciunas would have made much more sense, but apparently Cleveland wants to make an impact immediately. Something they might regret down the line.</p>
<p>I think Cleveland should have offered Minnesota everything but it&#8217;s first pick to move up to 2 and draft Williams. If they had come out of the draft with Irving AND Williams, their future would have looked A LOT brighter.</p>
<p>Justin Harper is a stretch 4 that isn&#8217;t very big and probably won&#8217;t be much of a rebounder in the NBA. If he sticks, it&#8217;s because of his shooting. On Cleveland, that&#8217;s devoid of talent, he might, but with Antawn Jamison and J.J. Hickson as well as Anderson Varejao, who will probably be traded this summer, it&#8217;s puzzling why they&#8217;d take another power forward.</p>
<p><strong>NEW YORK: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Meets Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>45. <strong>Josh Harrellson</strong></p>
<p>New York gets the guy Enes Kanter apparently made into the player he is today. So says Harrellson.</p>
<p><strong>MINNESOTA:</strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong> Meets Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>2. <strong>Derrick Williams</strong></p>
<p>Traded Jonny Flynn for Houston&#8217;s 23rd pick, Nikola Mirotic, and Brad Miller.</p>
<p>For some reason the T-Wolves don&#8217;t end up with the 23d pick, so it&#8217;s basically a Flynn for Miller deal. Not sure why they&#8217;d do that.</p>
<p>Keeping Williams is the right move even though he doubles up on Beasley&#8217;s skills. He should be better than Bealsey and should give the Wolves some star power.</p>
<p><strong>UTAH: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Meets Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>3. <strong>Enes Kanter<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">12. </span>Alec Burks </strong></p>
<p>Although a lot of people had Brandon Knight going to Utah for the months leading up to the draft, they apparently changed their mind with less than a week to go. And while I was a little missed he didn&#8217;t fall to the Raptors, I think Utah will be VERY happy they chose Kanter instead of Knight.</p>
<p>Of course, while I think they made the right decision at 3, passing up Leonard, who is probably exactly what the Jazz need, is probably going to</p>
<p><strong>OKLAHOMA CITY: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Meets Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>27. <strong>Reggie Jackson</strong></p>
<p>Jackson is a combo guard who joins an already crowded Thunder backcourt. I really don&#8217;t know where he&#8217;ll find minutes. I wonder why Oklahoma didn&#8217;t simply trade out of the draft.</p>
<p><strong>PORTLAND: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Meets Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>21. <strong>Nolan Smith</strong><br />
51. <strong>Jon Diebler</strong></p>
<p>Traded Andre Miller for Raymond Felton</p>
<p>Traded Rudy Fernandez to Dallas for 26th pick, which they gave to Denver in prearranged deal.</p>
<p>Getting Felton for Miller is a great deal for Portland. He might be the young point guard they&#8217;ve been looking for all these years.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, picking Nolan Smith over Faried, who they could really use, was a mistake.</p>
<p><strong>ORLANDO: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Meets Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>53. <strong>DeAndre Liggins</strong></p>
<p>He&#8217;s a player that was on Kentucky, but now he&#8217;s not.</p>
<p><strong>ATLANTA: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Meets Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>48. <strong>Keith Benson</strong></p>
<p>He&#8217;s got legit size for an NBA power forward, and he&#8217;s stronger than he looks. For the 48th pick, the Hawks did well.</p>
<p>For a team hitting their ceiling, I would have liked to have seen them a little more active. Maybe after the new CBA is signed, whenever that happens.</p>
<p><strong>MIAMI: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Approaching Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>28. <strong>Norris Cole</strong></p>
<p>Somehow got the 28th pick from Chicago to draft Cole, a PG, who should provide insurance in case Bibby is not re-upped.</p>
<p><strong>BOSTON: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Approaching  Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>27. <strong>JuJuan Johnson<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">55. </span>E&#8217;Twaun Moore </strong></p>
<p>Traded their 25th pick for the 27th pick.</p>
<p>Johnson is a decent player, but I don&#8217;t see him making any impact on the Celtics, either now or down the line. But would anyone else have?</p>
<p>Moore is an undersized shooting guard, but I&#8217;m guessing what attracted Boston was the ability to tell people they drafted JuJuan and E&#8217;Twaun. And both are American.</p>
<p><strong>MILWAUKEE: </strong><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Approaching Expectations</span></strong></p>
<p>19. <strong>Tobias Harris</strong><br />
40. <strong>John Leuer</strong></p>
<p>Traded Corey Maggette and 10th pick for Stephen Jackson and Charlotte&#8217;s 19th pick, Tobias Harris.</p>
<p>Getting rid of Maggette, who was a disaster, is good, but is Jackson really what they need? And how much longer does he have? Harris is a good pick, though, who&#8217;s been compared to Shane Battier.</p>
<p><strong>PHOENIX: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Approaching  Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>13. <strong>Markieff Morris</strong></p>
<p>Morris might make a pretty good role player on a good team. Phoenix, however, needs home runs, not singles. They have a lot of role players and the engine that makes them go, Nash, is nearing the end of his career.</p>
<p><strong>GOLDEN STATE: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Approaching Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>11. <strong>Klay Thompson</strong><br />
37. <strong>Jeremy Tyler</strong><br />
44. <strong>Charles Jenkins</strong></p>
<p>So they STILL have Monta Ellis, yet decide to draft yet another shooter, while Kawhi Leonard  and Nikola Vucevic were still available. Thompson might be the best player available, for all I know, though, and if Jerry West thinks so, it&#8217;s probably true.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about Tyler, though, who seems to have the physical tools, but needs maturity.</p>
<p><strong>WASHINGTON: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Approaching Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>6. <strong>Jan Vesely</strong><br />
18.<strong>Chris Singleton<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">34. </span></strong><strong>Shelvin Mack </strong></p>
<p>A lot of teams seemed high on Vesley, but I don&#8217;t understand the attraction to him. He&#8217;s 6&#8217;11 and athletic, but he&#8217;s not a great scorer, can&#8217;t shoot, isn&#8217;t a good ball handler, will probably struggle defensively at the 3 and is a poor rebounder for his size. He&#8217;s apparently got a good motor, though, and he&#8217;s got a very hot girlfriend, so those are both pluses.</p>
<p>Singleton was on my don&#8217;t draft list and I really don&#8217;t see how he&#8217;s going to play with Vesley. Neither can shoot, but Singleton has even fewer skills than Vesley.</p>
<p><strong>NEW JERSEY: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Approaching Expectations</strong></span></p>
<p>25. <strong>Marshon Brooks</strong><br />
36.<strong> Jordan Williams</strong></p>
<p>Traded their 27th pick, JaJuan Johnson for Boston&#8217;s 25th pick, Marshon Brooks</p>
<p>When I first saw a trade between Boston and New Jersey involving Brooks, I thought it was a blockbuster. No, it was not Brooks Lopez, but Marshon Brooks, who bring his great shooting and horrible defense to a bad defensive team.</p>
<p><strong>CLIPPERS: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Needs Improvement</strong></span></p>
<p>37. <strong>Trey Thompkins</strong><br />
47. <strong>Travis Leslie</strong></p>
<p>The Clippers traded away a unprotected lottery pick that ended up being Kyrie Irving, who&#8217;s probably just what the Clippers could have used to solidify them as one of the teams of the future. What they ended up drafting were two solid NCAA players with probably very little chance of sticking in the NBA.</p>
<p><strong>SACRAMENTO: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Needs Improvement</strong></span></p>
<p>10. <strong>Jimmer Fredette</strong><br />
35. <strong>Tyler Honeycutt</strong></p>
<p>Traded their 7th pick for Milwaukee&#8217;s 10th pick, Jimmer Fredette, and John Salmons</p>
<p>So, the Kings trade John Salmons away, only to trade back for him a couple of years later. And move down in the draft in order to do it. Fredette might be a great shooter, but I don&#8217;t see how he helps Sacramento. He&#8217;s not going to be a good defender and will do nothing for the chemistry. Keeping the pick and taking Knight or Walker would have been preferable.</p>
<p><strong>HOUSTON: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Needs Improvement</strong></span></p>
<p>14. <strong>Marcus Morris</strong><br />
38. <strong>Chandler Parsons</strong></p>
<p>Traded Brad Miller, the 23rd pick and a future first rounder for Minnesota&#8217;s 20th pick, <strong>Donatas Motiejunas</strong>, and Jonny Flynn.</p>
<p>Houston&#8217;s GM, Daryl Morey, intrigues me. He&#8217;s apparently a big advanced stats guy and was initially a guy a lot of Raptor fans wanted to replace Colangelo, but he makes the most head scratching trades. Motiejunas was another on my do not draft list. He doesn&#8217;t defend or rebound, but should be able to score a lot, which makes him basically a bigger version of Kevin Martin</p>
<p>Morris is, yet another young, decent power forward to join Houston&#8217;s stable of other decent, power forwards. Apparently you can never get enough of them.</p>
<p>Parsons is a typical Rocket small forward. he does a whole lot of things, but none of them really well.</p>
<p><strong>INDIANA: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Needs Improvement</strong></span></p>
<p>Traded their 15th pick, Kawhi Leonard, to the Spurs for George Hill</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t the Pacers already have enough PGs who aren&#8217;t really PGs? George Hill looked good in the Spurs system, but you need to watch out for those guys, because there&#8217;s a good chance he won&#8217;t look nearly as good out of it. And while the Pacers already have enough SFs, don&#8217;t they know not to trade a draft pick to the Spurs?</p>
<p><strong>NEW ORLEANS: </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Incomplete</strong></span></p>
<p>Traded completely out of the draft by trading the 45th pick, Josh Harrellson, to the Knicks for cash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/06/2011-nba-draft-report-card/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let The Overanalyzing Begin!</title>
		<link>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/06/let-the-overanalyzing-begin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/06/let-the-overanalyzing-begin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim W.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bulls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celtics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mavericks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pistons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raptors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rockets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spurs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/?p=1278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the Dirk Nowitzki-led Dallas Mavericks have defeated the evil empire, AKA the Miami Heat, and whenever a new champion is crowned, everyone loves to figure out what it all means. It happens every year and every year it usually ends up meaning about as much as an apology from a celebrity. Not much. No, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/n/nowitdi01.html" target="_blank">Dirk  Nowitzki</a>-led Dallas Mavericks have defeated the evil empire, AKA the Miami Heat, and whenever a new champion is crowned, everyone loves to figure out what it all means. It happens every year and every year it usually ends up meaning about as much as an apology from a celebrity. Not much.</p>
<p><a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/dirk_nowitzki_celebrates_his_finals_win_with_a_whole_lotta_champagne.jpg" class="thickbox no_icon" rel="gallery-1278" title="dirk_nowitzki_celebrates_his_finals_win_with_a_whole_lotta_champagne"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1307" style="margin: 5px;" title="dirk_nowitzki_celebrates_his_finals_win_with_a_whole_lotta_champagne" src="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/dirk_nowitzki_celebrates_his_finals_win_with_a_whole_lotta_champagne-300x224.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="224" /></a>No, I really don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a good idea to be combing through Europe to find the next Dirk, just as it wasn&#8217;t a good idea to start stacking your team with two centers, after Houston miraculously made it to the Finals, in 1986, with Hakeem Olajuwon and Ralph Sampson, or to start trying to convert shooting guards and small forwards into point guards, simply because Magic Johnson was 6&#8217;9 and could pass and handle the ball like a guy a foot shorter.</p>
<p>You see, the main reason it&#8217;s not a good idea to start copying teams that have just won Championships is because you can&#8217;t duplicate someone else&#8217;s success. There&#8217;s not blueprint you can follow. Every Champion has been completely unique. Look back at all the teams that have won and you can&#8217;t really say that any team was like any other one that ended up winning it all.</p>
<p>The teams that end up winning it all are usually teams that don&#8217;t try and be like another team, or even build itself to beat another team (talk about a bad idea). The real contenders are the ones who are trailblazers (no pun intended) and make everyone else adjust to them, not the other way around.</p>
<p>In the end, THAT&#8217;S what we may have learned this season. Well, if you hadn&#8217;t been paying attention the last 50 or so years the NBA has been around.</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;m not saying the playoffs weren&#8217;t entertaining, because they most definitely were. Close games and unexpected results are always entertaining. But watching the playoffs, something kept gnawing at my brain.</p>
<p>When my beloved Spurs were knocked out in the first round, I realized that these playoffs were going to be a little different. The big problem was not that the #8 seeded Grizzlies knocking off the #1 seeded Spurs was a huge upset. It was, but not to the degree it seemed. The problem was that despite winning 61 games, second in the NBA, the Spurs were simply not that good a team. And neither were any of the other teams out there. I never once thought to myself, &#8220;Wow, THAT&#8217;S a Championship team&#8221;, while watching ANY team play. A few teams looked great in spurts, but in many ways, this year looks a lot like the 2004 season when the Larry Brown coached Detroit Pistons won their Championship.</p>
<p>2004 was, in many ways, a hiccup year. The two top teams were the Indiana Pacers and Minnesota Timberwolves, two teams that had not made it out of the first round of the playoffs in at least the previous three years and had only won 51 and 48 games respectively the previous season.  And both teams only won 44 games the next season.  This was a weird year, to say the least.</p>
<p>And the Detroit Pistons took advantage. Despite winning only 54 games in a very weak East, the Pistons were able to make it to the Finals just in time to play a collapsing Laker team that was on the verge of being broken up and Phil Jackson retiring (the first time, having learned from Jordan that only sissies retire once). The Pistons would become one of the least talented Championship teams in the last few decades, becoming the first team since 1979 to win a Championship without a current or former All-NBA player (<a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/b/billuch01.html" target="_blank">Chauncey  Billups</a> would later make the All-NBA 2nd team, but not until after the team had won their Championship) on the roster.</p>
<p>So what does all that have to do with these playoffs? Well, as I said, no team really jumped out at me as being great this year, or in these playoffs, not even the NBA Champion Mavericks.</p>
<p>The Celtics completely screwed themselves when they traded <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/p/perkike01.html" target="_blank">Kendrick  Perkins</a> and, with him, the only advantage they had over Miami. Ironically, they made the trade in order to try and be able to defend Miami better, proving they were apparently one of the people not paying attention the last 50 years. Instead of making Miami adjust to their size, Boston blinked first and adjusted their roster to beat Miami. And lost.</p>
<p>Orlando went from contender to pretender when they tried to turn back the clock and sacrificed defense for offense in trading for <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/t/turkohe01.html" target="_blank">Hedo  Turkoglu</a>. Orlando also hadn&#8217;t been paying attention the last 50 years when nearly every single NBA Champion consisted of one of the best defensive teams in the league. I find it amazing that Otis Smith, who until he got his job in Orlando was noteworthy only because he competed in a dunk contest against Michael Jordan while he was at Golden State, still has his job after trying to beat the record for killing a team&#8217;s title chances the fastest.</p>
<p>The Lakers won 57 games, but never once looked like the dominant team that marched to the Championship the last two years. And the Spurs, despite having one of the worst defensive seasons in over a decade, won 61 games, yet never seemed to be a real threat to win the title.</p>
<p>And then there&#8217;s Miami. Well, I do find it funny that there is so much discussion on the internet that the Miami experiment is now considered a failure and that the big 3 needs to be broken up. This from a team that came within 2 wins of winning the title. If Miami needs to be broken up, I&#8217;d hate to think what needs to be done in Chicago or Boston, both of whom could only take a game from Miami in their march to the Finals.</p>
<p>Miami was never the dominant team that some expected, but neither are they the disaster that people are making them out to be, now. On a related note, LeBron is being completely maligned after coming up short in the deciding game, yet until just a few games ago, people were talking about LeBron being better than Michael Jordan. Even Jordan&#8217;s wingman, Scottie Pippen, <a  href="http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/nba/news/story?id=6599168" target="_blank">uttered such unbelievable thoughts</a>. But just as they tried to anoint (and then tarnish and then anoint etc) <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/b/bryanko01.html" target="_blank">Kobe  Bryant</a> as the air apparent, the media and fans try and jump to conclusions far too quickly.</p>
<p>So what does this all mean? Well, it means that Dallas is the best team this year, but that might not be saying much. It means that LeBron isn&#8217;t Jordan, but that&#8217;s not necessarily an insult. It means that everything will start over again in October, if we&#8217;re lucky.</p>
<p>As one of the main focuses of this blog is on the Raptors, does it mean anything to the Raptors? Well it doesn&#8217;t mean at all what PhdSteve, over at Raptors Republic, <a  href="http://raptorsrepublic.com/2011/06/08/rapcast-107-bargnani-and-the-finals-casey-derozanminny-link-analysis/" target="_blank">seems to think it does</a>. I don&#8217;t see Miami&#8217;s defeat as somehow a &#8220;referendum&#8221; on just how valuable <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/b/bargnan01.html" target="_blank">Andrea  Bargnani</a> is. The one thing we learned from these playoffs (again, for those who weren&#8217;t paying attention the previous 50 years) is that defense wins and bad defensive players <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/i/ilgauzy01.html" target="_blank">Zydrunas  Ilgauskas</a>, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/b/bibbymi01.html" target="_blank">Mike  Bibby</a> and <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/s/stojape01.html" target="_blank">Peja  Stojakovic</a> all are players that were never the greatest defensive players, but have simply become bad as they&#8217;ve gotten older. And all three watched their minutes plummet as the playoffs progressed.</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t just the teams in the Finals, though. On Boston, the former starter at center for the Oklahoma City Thunder, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/k/krstine01.html" target="_blank">Nenad  Krstic</a>, watched his playing time disappear because, while a good offensive player, was a weak link on a good defensive team.</p>
<p>Now, astute readers will point to <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/r/randoza01.html" target="_blank">Zach  Randolph</a>, a player who&#8217;s never been accused of taking defense too seriously, came within a game of leading his team to the Conference Finals. Well, all I can say is that Memphis might have ended up beating the Thunder of Randolph was a better defender. Or if that doesn&#8217;t work, I could just say they&#8217;re the exception that proves the rule, whatever that means.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>COACHING CAROUSEL</p>
<p>Getting back to the Raptors, I find myself unable to get too excited about the coaching search. Dwayne Casey, <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/coaches/frankla99c.html" target="_blank">Lawrence  Frank</a> and now Maurice Cheeks are are perfectly adequate choices. Unfortunately, that&#8217;s exactly what I think they are adequate. Only a desperate coach is going to want to take over a 22 win team with mediocre talent, so the chance of hiring a great coach is pretty slim. It&#8217;s one of the reasons I thought the letting go of Triano was a little premature. First of all, I don&#8217;t think he did that bad of a job. No, he didn&#8217;t do a good one, either, but given what he was given, I don&#8217;t think anyone would have done much better. And I don&#8217;t know if there would have been much harm in giving him one more year. After that, the team might have more talent to attract a better coach.</p>
<p>GETTING TOO GREEDY</p>
<p><a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/06/the-pg-conundrum-other-nba-stories/">In my last post</a>, I discussed how Golden State might be on the right track when rumours surfaced about a possible trade of <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/e/ellismo01.html" target="_blank">Monta  Ellis</a> for <a  href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/i/iguodan01.html" target="_blank">Andre  Iguodala</a>. I&#8217;ve always thought that Ellis, while a fantastic scorer, is basically like a model with a drug habit. Sure, she looks great, but the relationship is never going to go anywhere. Iguodala isn&#8217;t the scorer that Ellis is, but he&#8217;s better at virtually every other aspect of the game. But now news is that Golden State wants more than Iguodala. Maybe that&#8217;s why I&#8217;m not a GM (well, that and I&#8217;m not exactly qualified). I&#8217;d take the offer and run. With Jerry West advising the Warriors, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if they now end up with Philly&#8217;s first round pick, or something.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/06/let-the-overanalyzing-begin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trades, Trades and More Trades!</title>
		<link>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/02/trades-trades-and-more-trades/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/02/trades-trades-and-more-trades/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 08:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim W.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blazers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobcats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cavs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celtics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clippers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grizzlies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hornets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jazz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuggets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raptors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rockets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Wolves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thunder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wizards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/?p=1261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It says something about me that my three favourite times of the year, in the NBA, are the Playoffs, the Draft and just before the trade deadline. It&#8217;s like Christmas three times a year, but my bank account doesn&#8217;t get drained by it. Like my offseason grades, I&#8217;m going to look at each team and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It says something about me that my three favourite times of the year, in the NBA, are the Playoffs, the Draft and just before the trade deadline. It&#8217;s like Christmas three times a year, but my bank account doesn&#8217;t get drained by it.</p>
<p>Like my offseason grades, I&#8217;m going to look at each team and look at what they did as a whole, starting with the Raptors&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>TORONTO: Incomplete</strong></p>
<p><em>- James Johnson for Heat&#8217;s 2011 First Round Pick</em></p>
<p>For the Raptors, they didn&#8217;t make a big splash, but they did make one trade. Miami&#8217;s first round pick in the upcoming draft for James Johnson. To be honest, I was not a fan of Johnson coming out of Wake Forest. It didn&#8217;t instil me with confidence when both his name and Earl Clark&#8217;s were both mentioned as possibilities for the 9th pick that was eventually used to pick DeMar DeRozan. Both Johnson and Clark had fatal flaws that I turn me right off prospects. Things like &#8220;Low Basketball IQ&#8221;, or &#8220;Lack of Defensive Fundamentals&#8221; or worst of all, &#8220;Lack of Focus&#8221;. The &#8220;focus&#8221; issue is something that scares me off more than anything. This is actually something I&#8217;m going to discuss in a later post, but suffice is to say, I wasn&#8217;t a James Johnson fan.</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;m giving Toronto an incomplete grade on this for a couple of reasons. The first is that no one really knows what kind of player James Johnson is. Yes, I know he played well in his Raptor debut against his old team, the Bulls, but that was one game. Let&#8217;s see how he does for the remaining 24 before we make any judgements.</p>
<p>The other reason they get an incomplete is because we really don&#8217;t know whether this draft is going to be as bad as people seem to think it is going to be. And that&#8217;s not just the players, but the value of the draft picks. Right now, it seems draft picks for the upcoming draft are being given away like Carmelo Anthony Nugget jerseys. Personally, I would have liked to see if the Heat pick could have been packaged to move up in the draft, or to try and draft a sleeper. Still, I don&#8217;t dislike the trade because the Heat&#8217;s pick looks like it&#8217;s going to be around 27, and the chances of finding a quality player that far down is extremely slim, especially if this draft is as bad as people say.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll say this, if Johnson continues to play like he did in his debut, then this trade is a home run. He showed everything the Raptors lack, and he&#8217;ll be given every chance.</p>
<p><strong>OKLAHOMA CITY: Exceeds Expectations</strong></p>
<p><em>- Kendrick Perkins and Nate Robinson for Jeff Green and Nenad Krstic</em></p>
<p><em></em><em>- Nazr Mohommed for Morris Peterson and D.J. White </em></p>
<p>This past summer, I<a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2010/09/grading-the-offseason-17-10/"> gave the Thunder a &#8220;Meets Expectations&#8221; grade</a> because, while they made some good moves, they failed to fill the hole in the middle. With the only good defensive player in the middle being Serge Ibaka, and Cole Aldrich looking like a potential bust, the Thunder desperately needed another good big man. I suggested, before the New Year, <a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2010/12/top-5-trades-that-need-to-happen-in-201/">trading Jeff Green, Aldrich and a 1st round pick to Cleveland for Anderson Varejao</a>, but Varejao&#8217;s season ending injury pretty much killed that possibility. Instead of Varejao, they went out and got Kendrick Perkins.</p>
<p>Am I the only one who thinks this might shift the balance of power in the West?</p>
<p>Oklahoma&#8217;s biggest weakness this year has been their defense. They can score, but with Green and Krstic as their starting front court, they had trouble stopping people.</p>
<p>Now they have one of the best defensive centers in the league, in Perkins, and one of the best up and coming defensive big men in the league, in Ibaka. While they still lack a true low post scoring threat, a fact that might haunt them come the playoffs, this could be the move that launches them from pretender to true contender. Especially in the West where San Antonio and the Lakers are the two teams you have to go through. Now oklahoma can match their size.</p>
<p>And then they grabbed Nazr Mohammed as Perkins&#8217; backup. Yes, Nazr is vastly overpaid, but it&#8217;s expiring, so it doesn&#8217;t matter.</p>
<p>The only question is whether or not Perkins is healthy. If he is, then Oklahoma made out the best of anyone.</p>
<p><strong>DENVER: Exceeds Expectations</strong></p>
<p><em>- </em><em>Danilo Gallinari, </em><em>Wilson Chandler, </em><em>Raymond Felton, </em><em>Timofey Mozgov, </em><em>Kosta Koufos, K</em><em>nicks first-round pick (2014 or later) and the </em><em>Warriors&#8217; second-round picks in 2012 and 2013 for Carmelo Anthony, </em><em>Chauncey Billups, </em><em>Shelden Williams, </em><em>Renaldo Balkman and </em><em>Anthony Carter</em></p>
<p><a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/02/carmelo-the-fallout-and-why-i-hate-the-all-star-game-2/">I already discussed this deal</a>, but I&#8217;ll just say that with their back against the wall and everyone knowing where Carmelo would eventually go, Denver did very well. I thought they had secured 2 first round picks, but apparently not. Still staying out of this year&#8217;s draft probably isn&#8217;t such a bad thing. They got some nice young talent they can eventually flip for something, or try and develop themselves. Either way, they&#8217;ve got a lot of choices, now. And they&#8217;ll probably still compete for a playoff spot with the talent they have.</p>
<p><strong>NEW JERSEY: Exceeds Expectations</strong></p>
<p><em>- Deron Williams for </em><em>Devin Harris, </em><em>Derrick Favors and t</em><em>wo 2011 first-round picks</em></p>
<p><em></em><em>- </em><em>Brandan Wright and </em><em>Dan Gadzuric for Troy Murphy and Net&#8217;s 2112 second-round pick</em></p>
<p>No deal has ever surprised me like Deron Williams going to the Nets. In this day and age, where everyone seems to know everything, that one came out of left field. And without any warning. Personally, I think Deron might be a better player than Anthony, but either way, I think he&#8217;s going to help the team more than Anthony ever could. He makes his teammates better and should be able to attract some talent to the Nets, something they failed to do this past summer.</p>
<p>Getting Williams was certainly a risk. Favors could blow up to be a great player and they gave up their lottery pick in the upcoming draft, which apparently has no protection, plus Golden State&#8217;s protected pick next year. Plus, Williams might just leave in a year and a half. But I doubt it.</p>
<p>And getting something for Troy Murphy was pretty good. Wright can&#8217;t seem to stay healthy, but there was a time when he held a lot of promise. New Jersey can afford to gamble on him.</p>
<p><strong>HOUSTON: Exceeds Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Hasheem Thabeet, DeMarre Carroll and Memphis&#8217; first-round pick for Shane Battier and Ishmael Smith</em></p>
<p><em>- Goran Dragic and Phoenix&#8217;s protected first-round pick for Aaron Brooks</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been a fan of Battier since his days at Duke, and would love him to eventually go to a real contender, where he deserves, but Houston was not going to make the playoffs, and he probably wasn&#8217;t going to return as a free agent this summer. Getting a project like Thabeet is a low risk gamble that could pay off big, especially if he fulfills the expectations that made him a 2nd pick.</p>
<p>Brooks, on the other hand, is the type of PG I dislike. He&#8217;s a shoot first PG that makes his teammates grumble with his shot selection and unwillingness to pass. Yes, he can score, but I like my PGs to make everyone else better, and Brooks doesn&#8217;t do that.</p>
<p>Plus, they got a couple of first round picks. Not a bad days work.</p>
<p><strong>PORTLAND: Meets Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Gerald Wallace for </em><em>Joel Przybilla, </em><em>Dante Cunningham, </em><em>Sean Marks and t</em><em>wo first-round draft picks</em></p>
<p>Portland got exceptionally better, and gave up very little. Wallace can play PF and give them a small lineup that can still rebound, or play SF and give them a big lineup. With Roy still a question mark, getting a guy like Wallace, who can score, rebound and defend, was important. Plus, he&#8217;s only 28 despite being the league 9 years.</p>
<p><strong>CLIPPERS: Meets Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Mo Williams and Jamario Moon for Baron Davis and the Clipper&#8217;s 2011 first-round pick</em></p>
<p>Another surprise, since Baron Davis had been playing fairly well recently. Of course, the smart GM would use that opportunity to trade him. Who knew the Clippers had a smart GM?</p>
<p>One of the worst things the Clippers have done in the last decade (and there&#8217;s been a lot to choose from) might have been giving Davis that huge contract. In 11 seasons in the NBA, Davis has had exactly one exceptional season where he was completely healthy. The season before the Clippers signed him away from Golden State.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never been a fan of Mo Williams but if it&#8217;s a choice between him for 3 more years at $8.5 million and Baron Davis for 3 more years at $14 million, I&#8217;m going to choose Mo every time. And while giving up a lottery pick might seem like a steep price to get rid of Davis, the last thing the Clippers need right now is another young player, and no one&#8217;s liking the look of this draft, so it might end up being worthless, anyway.</p>
<p><strong>ATLANTA: Meets Expectation</strong>s</p>
<p>- <em>Kirk Hinrich and Hilton Armstrong for Mike Bibby, Maurice Evans, Jordan Crawford and Atlanta&#8217;s 2011 first-round pick</em></p>
<p>I thought trading for Bibby a few years ago was fantastic for the Hawks. They desperately needed a veteran PG and Bibby had been in the playoff trenches. But he&#8217;s not the player he once was, and his defense is now pretty much non existent. Hinrich is a massive upgrade, and is an excellent defense. Plus, like Bibby, he doesn&#8217;t need the ball to be effective, which is important playing next to Joe Johnson.</p>
<p><strong>NEW YORK: Meets Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Carmelo Anthony, </em><em>Chauncey Billups,</em><em>Shelden Williams, </em><em>Renaldo Balkman and </em><em>Anthony Carter</em> for <em>Danilo Gallinari, </em><em>Wilson Chandler, </em><em>Raymond Felton, </em><em>Timofey Mozgov, </em><em>Kosta Koufos, K</em><em>nicks first-round pick (2014 or later) and the </em><em>Warriors&#8217; second-round picks in 2012 and 2013</em></p>
<p>As I said, <a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/02/carmelo-the-fallout-and-why-i-hate-the-all-star-game-2/">I already discussed this deal</a>, and New York obviously came out of the trade with the best player, but I&#8217;m not convinced New York is ever going to be a serious contender with Anthony and Amare.</p>
<p><strong>NEW ORLEANS: Meets Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Carl Landry for Marcus Thornton</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a big fan of either of these guys, but Thornton wasn&#8217;t getting any time because he apparently doesn&#8217;t play defense, and New Orleans is sorely lacking inside scoring. Enter Landry, who doesn&#8217;t rebound and isn&#8217;t a great defender, but can score inside.</p>
<p><strong>CHICAGO: Meets Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Miami&#8217;s 2011 first-round pick for James Johnson</em></p>
<p>Johnson was obviously not going to break into the Bulls&#8217; lineup, so getting a first round pick was probably the best thing they could have done.</p>
<p><strong>MEMPHIS: Approaching Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em><em>Shane Battier and Ishmael Smith for <em><em>Hasheem Thabeet, DeMarre Carroll and Memphis&#8217; first-round pick</em></em></em></em></p>
<p>Giving up Thabeet and a first-round pick was a big gamble for a player who might not eve re-sign with Memphis this summer, but Battier is exactly the type of player they need. A steady, smart veteran who doesn&#8217;t need the ball to be effective and who knows how to win. Memphis obviously hopes he&#8217;ll rub off on everyone else on the team.</p>
<p>I still think they should have traded Zach Randolph while his stock was so high.</p>
<p><strong>BOSTON: Approaching Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em><em>Jeff Green and Nenad Krstic</em><span style="font-style: normal;"> for </span></em><em><em>Kendrick Perkins and Nate Robinson</em></em></p>
<p><em><em>- Sacramento&#8217;s second-round pick for </em></em><em><em>Marquis Daniels</em></em></p>
<p><em><em>- Cleveland&#8217;s second-round pick for </em>Semih Erden and L</em><em>uke Harangody</em></p>
<p>When Kendrick Perkins got injured a couple of seasons ago in the playoffs, it cost the Celtics the title. He might be one of the best centers in the league at defending Dwight Howard. Trading away a very good defensive center in his prime is a huge, huge risk. One I think might come back to haunt the Celtics.</p>
<p>I like Jeff Green, and I think not being forced to play PF will do him a world of good, and I think he&#8217;s a very good defender at the SF position, but basically the Celtics gave up a starter for a bench player. They are going to have to rely on Shaq a lot more at center, and this quote from Doc Rivers doesn&#8217;t do a lot for me: &#8221;Shaq&#8217;s a key component of this,&#8221; said Rivers. &#8220;We need to get Shaq healthy and Shaq will be healthy. If Shaq plays great, this deal was actually really good for us. That&#8217;s on Shaq. We have to get Shaq in great shape, get him ready, get him healthy. He&#8217;s really going to be important for us in the playoffs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Plus, the Celtics are going to have two players (Shaq and Rondo) who can&#8217;t hit free throws. You don&#8217;t think that might hurt them?</p>
<p><strong>SACRAMENTO: Approaching Expectations</strong></p>
<p><em>- Marcus Thornton for Carl Landry</em></p>
<p><em>- Marquis Daniels for a second-round pick</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not quite sure why Sacramento would want Thornton or Daniels, since they already have Evans Casspi and Garcia, but I guess they didn&#8217;t give up much, so why not.</p>
<p><strong>MINNESOTA: Approaching Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Anthony Randolph and Eddy Curry for Corey Brewer</em></p>
<p>Yes, Minnesota is acquiring assets, but Corey Brewer is more productive than Anthony Randolph, and Minnesota agreed to take on Eddy Curry to get him. Randolph better end up panning out.</p>
<p><strong>WASHINGTON: Approaching Expectations</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Mike Bibby, Maurice Evans, Jordan Crawford and Atlanta&#8217;s 2011 first-round pick for Kirk Hinrich and Hilton Armstrong</em></p>
<p>I find it hard to believe that the best Washington could have gotten for Hinrich was Mike Bibby and another year of his contract and a late first-round pick in a bad draft. It&#8217;s not bad, but I wouldn&#8217;t say it was good, either.</p>
<p><strong>CLEVELAND: WHY??????</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Baron Davis  and the Clippers 2011 first-round pick for Mo Williams and Jamario Moon</em></p>
<p><em>- <em>Semih Erden and L</em><em>uke Harangody for a second-round pick</em></em></p>
<p>I can understand wanting to get the Clippers first round pick (probably a top 10 pick), but is it really worth taking on Baron Davis when you couldn&#8217;t even get rid of Antoine Jamison and his awful contract?</p>
<p><strong>PHOENIX: Your Kid Is A Moron</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Aaron Brooks for Goran Dragic and Phoenix&#8217;s protected first-round pick</em></p>
<p>I have absolutely no idea what Phoenix is doing. Brooks is a brutal PG because he can&#8217;t pass, so he&#8217;s the anti-Nash. And they gave up a first round pick when they should be collecting them.</p>
<p><strong>UTAH: Incomplete</strong></p>
<p>- <em>Devin Harris, </em><em>Derrick Favors and t</em><em>wo 2011 first-round picks</em> for <em>Deron Williams</em></p>
<p>As I previously said, this trade came out of nowhere, and I&#8217;m not quite sure how I feel about it from Utah&#8217;s perspective. If Williams was indeed on his way out of town, as some have said, then trading him now was a fantastic idea. And getting what they did for him was very good. Personally, I liked the Nets offer for Carmelo better than the Knicks, and the Jazz ended up getting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/02/trades-trades-and-more-trades/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My All-Stars And Other Stories&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/02/my-all-stars-and-other-stories/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/02/my-all-stars-and-other-stories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim W.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blazers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cavs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celtics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clippers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grizzlies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jazz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mavericks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuggets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raptors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Wolves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thunder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Proposals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warriors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/?p=1249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick post with the All-Star reserves being announced later today. The Rookies and Sophomores were announced and while DeMar DeRozan was selected, Ed Davis was not.  Was Davis deserving? Sure, but  wouldn&#8217;t call it a snub. Favors, who got in over Davis, has similar numbers and with the Nets not having anyone with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick post with the All-Star reserves being announced later today.</p>
<p>The Rookies and Sophomores were announced and while DeMar DeRozan was selected, Ed Davis was not.  Was Davis deserving? Sure, but  wouldn&#8217;t call it a snub. Favors, who got in over Davis, has similar numbers and with the Nets not having anyone with any chance to make the team, I&#8217;m guessing the NBA wanted them to have some presence. It&#8217;s likely Davis will replace Blake Griffin, anyway, since most feel Griffin is going to be playing in the big game.</p>
<p>As for the real All-Stars, here would be my selections:</p>
<p><strong>WEST</strong></p>
<p>Guards:</p>
<p>Like other years in the West, there are more All-Stars than spots available for the All-Star game. Guys who probably should make it, but don&#8217;t really have a shot, like Steve Nash and Tony Parker, would probably make it in the East.</p>
<p><strong>Manu Ginobili</strong></p>
<p>The best player on the best team in the league. Yes, Tim Duncan may be still the franchise player, but Ginobili is the guy who carries this team and he&#8217;s having a career year now that he&#8217;s finally injury free. The reason the Spurs are my favourite to win the title is partly because of this guy. No one gets better at crunch time than him. No one.</p>
<p><strong>Deron Williams</strong></p>
<p>Deron deserves a better team than he is surrounded by at the moment, and Utah&#8217;s high level mediocrity is not his fault. Without him, this team wouldn&#8217;t have a shot at the playoffs.</p>
<p>Forwards:</p>
<p>Someone deserving is going to get left off, and, like the guard position snubs, at least one of them would probably make it if he had this season in the East.</p>
<p><strong>Dirk Nowitzki</strong></p>
<p>Before he went down with injury, Dallas was the second best team in the league. Without him, they were 2-7. It&#8217;s not hard to do the math on that one. Nowitzki will never be the defensive force that most Hall of Fame big men are, and because of that probably won&#8217;t ever lead Dallas to a Championship (Dallas has underperformed consistently in the playoffs with him), but there&#8217;s no doubt this team is far, far much better because of him.</p>
<p><strong>Blake Griffin</strong></p>
<p>Blake Griffin very well might be having the best rookie season since Tim Duncan. He&#8217;s 12th in scoring, 4th in rebounding and even dishing a very good 3.6 assists per game, 3rd among ALL big men (PFs and centers) in the league. And he&#8217;s getting better every month. Plus, he&#8217;s actually helping the Clippers not suck, which is enough to get my vote. Still, if he wants to become truly great, he&#8217;s going to have to vastly improve his defense because right now he makes Amare Stoudemire look like Bill Russell.</p>
<p>Center:</p>
<p>Remember when the West had Shaq in his prime and David Robinson and Hakeem Olajuwon still playing very high level basketball? Now, in order to find a healthy, All-Star worthy center, you have to use the David Stern added rule that you can pick someone who ALSO plays center.</p>
<p><strong>Pau Gasol</strong></p>
<p>Gasol has struggled this year, partly due to an increased workload, but he&#8217;s still been one of the main reasons why the Lakers, despite their struggles, are still number 2 in the West.</p>
<p>Wildcards:</p>
<p><strong>Kevin Love</strong></p>
<p>He scores 21.4 ppg and grabs a monstrous 15.5 rpg despite taking 148 shots from beyond the arc and being 10th in the league in 3 point percentage. Oh, and he&#8217;s one of the top passers at his position. Sure, he plays for the basement dwelling T-Wolves, but <a  href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2OkK2jupU8" target="_blank">as his video tells us</a>, he&#8217;s got the numbers</p>
<p><strong>Russell Westbrook</strong></p>
<p>Some thought he was Oklahoma&#8217;s MVP in the early part of the season, and he&#8217;s shown some kinks in his armour (why is a PG who shoots 43% from the field taking 17 shots per game), but he&#8217;s still helped Oklahoma move up to the fourth seed in the West.</p>
<p>Who I left off:</p>
<p>Obviously I&#8217;ve left off some very good players. Tim Duncan was probably the most difficult omission, since he plays on the best team in the league, right now, but does anyone really think he&#8217;s not going to be selected to replace Yao?</p>
<p>Tony Parker and Steve Nash I already mentioned, and it&#8217;s a shame they won&#8217;t make it because they are having All-Star seasons. There just simply isn&#8217;t room.</p>
<p>Another guy I&#8217;d love to include, but can&#8217;t, is LaMarcus Aldridge. He&#8217;s carries the Blazers since Roy went down and if he had played like he has in January for the entire season, I&#8217;d be tempted to include him. Still, he&#8217;s quietly becoming one of the best PFs in the league.</p>
<p>I know Monta Ellis and Zach Randolph put up great numbers, and I included Kevin Love because of his great stats, but I simply can&#8217;t see either player ever being a major contributor for a contender. These are prototypical good players on bad teams.</p>
<p><strong>EAST</strong></p>
<p>Guards:</p>
<p>The guard position is very much like the Center position in the West. Obviously not as glaring, but still not exactly strong.</p>
<p><strong>Rajon Rondo</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing how much he&#8217;s improved since he was drafted. His lack of jumpshot might very well be the Celtic&#8217;s Achilles heal, but he&#8217;s still managed to shoot over 50% from the field, so he&#8217;s not exactly hurting the team much.</p>
<p><strong>Ray Allen</strong></p>
<p>He&#8217;s having his best season as a Celtic and looking nothing like the creaky, aging player that sometimes looked like he might not have a lot left in the tank the last year or two. I don&#8217;t know what the Celtics are giving him, but I want some.</p>
<p>Forwards:</p>
<p><strong>Kevin Garnett</strong></p>
<p>Back when Garnett went down with injury, in 2008, I was adamant that the Celtics were hiding the seriousness of the injury. They never satisfactorily explained the injury or commented how long he&#8217;d be out. The deeper the Celtics got in the playoffs, the more fishy it looked that he didn&#8217;t look like he was trying to return. Honestly, after that, I figured his career was pretty much done. Especially after the start last year. But whatever the Celtics are giving to Allen, they must also be giving to Garnett because he looks fully recovered.</p>
<p><strong>Chris Bosh</strong></p>
<p>Remember when everyone thought Chris Bosh was the problem in Miami during their horrible start? No one has any harsh words to say about him now (well, except for some Raptor fans). He&#8217;s not the best player on the Heat, but he&#8217;s just as important as Wade and LeBron to their success.</p>
<p>Center:</p>
<p>A lot has changed in the East at the center position when Jamaal Magloire made the All Star team for the sole fact that he was the best player at a position that didn&#8217;t include many good players.While the position is not exactly teeming with All-Star worthy players, with guys like Horford, Noah, Bogut and Lopez, the East looks like it won&#8217;t have any trouble filling the position any time soon.</p>
<p><strong>Al Horford</strong></p>
<p>Joe Johnson is the team&#8217;s leading scorer, but I think Horford has become the team&#8217;s best player. When Johnson went down, the team barely faltered, but they lost Horford, I think they&#8217;d be in trouble. He&#8217;s not a great scorer, but he can score if needed, and he really doesn&#8217;t have a weakness.</p>
<p>Wildcards:</p>
<p><strong>Paul Pierce</strong></p>
<p>The main reason the Celtics didn&#8217;t falter when Rondo went down was Paul Pierce played like an MVP. Like his other veteran stars, he&#8217;s getting old, but he&#8217;s proven he&#8217;s still got a couple of good years left, at least.</p>
<p><strong>Carlos Boozer</strong></p>
<p>The selection I&#8217;m least happy about. Noah is the second best player on Chicago, but because he&#8217;s injured, he&#8217;s out. I could easily be swayed to select Joe Johnson, instead, but Boozer had a big impact on Chicago, so he sneaks by. He&#8217;s still not a good defensive player, but he&#8217;s decent enough that he&#8217;s not a liability on that end.</p>
<p>Who I left off:</p>
<p>Obviously Joe Johnson was the hardest cut. And I&#8217;m not thrilled about having FOUR Celtics, no matter how good the team is. San Antonio only has three and they have the best record in the league. The truth is, though, that all four Celtic All-Stars are deserving.</p>
<p>Joakim Noah will be a perennial All-Star when he&#8217;s healthy, and his injury is the only thing that prevented his inclusion.</p>
<p>Andrew Bogut might end up being a perennial snub since both Noah and Horford should probably always be ahead of him. He&#8217;s still a very good player and would probably be an All-Star in the West, at center.</p>
<p>Josh Smith again misses out on the cut. Good, but not good enough.</p>
<p>&#8212;-</p>
<p>My end of the year post, which <a  href="http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2010/12/top-5-trades-that-need-to-happen-in-201/" target="_blank">detailed 5 trades that needed to happen in 2011</a>, may not have been so far out, after all. A few weeks after I posted that column, and not long after Anderson Varejao ended his season with an injury, it came out that Oklahoma was in discussions with Cleveland to try and get&#8230;you guessed it, Anderson Varejao.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>Speaking of my trades that need to happen, the Nets have pulled out and I think it&#8217;s probably the best thing for them. Carmelo has never proven to be enough of a difference maker to want to dismantle your team to get him. He&#8217;d certainly be a nice player if they can sign him, but if I were the Nets, I wouldn&#8217;t try and hit a home run with a kid&#8217;s bat (that&#8217;s the only analogy I could think of). Especially if the deal includes the aging Richard Hamilton and Chauncey Billups, who are still good, but aren&#8217;t going to get the Nets to the promised land.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>One more thing about Andrea Bargnani after last week&#8217;s column. Kevin Love, who is averaging 15.5 rpg has taken 3 fewer three point shots, while shooting a much higher percentage, than Andrea, this season. So much for the excuse that Bargnani doesn&#8217;t grab as many rebounds because he takes so many threes. Obviously Kevin Love doesn&#8217;t listen to excuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2011/02/my-all-stars-and-other-stories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Things We Learned Against The Bulls</title>
		<link>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2010/12/things-we-learned-against-the-bulls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2010/12/things-we-learned-against-the-bulls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 07:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim W.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bulls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raptors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/?p=1173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coming into Toronto, the Chicago Bulls had won 6 in a row, including the last 2 games by an average of 25 points, they have the third best record in the East, and have one of the best defenses in the league, anchored by one of the league&#8217;s premier defensive big man. They are also [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coming into Toronto, the Chicago Bulls had won 6 in a row, including the last 2 games by an average of 25 points, they have the third best record in the East, and have one of the best defenses in the league, anchored by one of the league&#8217;s premier defensive big man. They are also the best rebounding team in the league. Oh, and they not only have on of the best PGs in the league, in Derrick Rose, but one of the best players.</p>
<p>The Raptors, on the other hand, are 3-7 in their last ten, having given up 110.2 ppg in those ten games, stopping only Oklahoma from beating their season ppg average, and have been outrebounded by their opponents since Reggie Evans was injured. And while they are in the top ten in scoring, they are actually a pretty mediocre offensive team that doesn&#8217;t have much of an ability to create for themselves, are below average passing the ball, and are near the bottom in three point shooting. Oh, and they&#8217;re currently missing their two best offensive players, in Calderon and Bargnani.</p>
<p>So on the surface, things looked pretty bad for the Raptors. And I haven&#8217;t mentioned that they were trotting out the youngest starting lineup in Raptor history, at an average age of 22 years, with Weems, at 24, being the senior of the group. Conversely, Derrick Rose, at 22 years, is the only Bull starter UNDER the age of Weems&#8217; 24 years, Boozer is 29 and Keith Bogans in 30. Of the Raptors starters, only Amir Johnson has played more seasons than the least experienced Bulls starter, Rose. And Rose has played nearly twice as many minutes as Amir has.</p>
<p>Am I starting to paint you a clear enough picture?</p>
<p>So this game pretty much turned out as expected. Fortunately, even in bad losses, there are things that can be learned. And they are&#8230;</p>
<p>1. Jerryd Bayless is NOT a PG (and neither is Leandro Barbosa, for that matter). Looking at the stats, you might think that Bayless had a good game. He scored 20 points, on 9-15 shooting, had only 1 turnover, and held Derrick Rose 18 points BELOW his seasonal average of 24.7 ppg. This would be great if he also did what a PG is supposed to do.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, without the much maligned Jose Calderon available, Bayless was expected to run the offense. And he can&#8217;t do that. Chicago plays great defense, but it certainly didn&#8217;t help that Bayless doesn&#8217;t have a clue of how to run and offense and deliver the ball where it&#8217;s supposed to go. If this game doesn&#8217;t underline why I have always said that Calderon should be starting, I don&#8217;t know what will.</p>
<p>The big problem with trying to convert a SG into a PG is that running and offense and making your teammates better is mostly instinctual. It takes YEARS of playing that position to understand what needs to be done. It&#8217;s why I was so against drafting Avery Bradley at 13 in the last draft. He&#8217;s a talented players, but I doubt he&#8217;ll ever be a PG.</p>
<p>This game showed that, at this point, anyway, Bayless is a good player, but should never start.</p>
<p>2. Chicago is a very, very good team. This is the first game I&#8217;ve watched of them play since Boozer returned from injury and it reinforced why he is so important to this team. Taj Gibson is a good, young big man, but he&#8217;s not the low post threat that Boozer is, and is not the veteran Boozer is. Boozer&#8217;s in his 9th season, has played in 4 playoff series, including a trip to the Conference Finals, and has even played in 2 All Star games. He&#8217;s not a great defender, but he at least knows what to do on that end of the court, even if he&#8217;s not the most willing.</p>
<p>The two main reasons the Bulls are so good: Derrick Rose and their defense. Despite only scoring 6 points, Rose killed the Raptors with his playmaking. And the Bulls play such good defense, even if Bargnani and Calderon had played, the Raptors would still have had trouble scoring.</p>
<p>Chicago has an easy schedule ahead, which is a good thing because it appears Joakim Noah will be getting surgery on his injured hand and be out for a while. Hopefully, for Chicago, it&#8217;s not too long.</p>
<p>3. Ed Davis and Amir Johnson form a formidable defensive front line, but neither one of them should ever be asked to be the primary scorer. Without Bargnani, I was hoping to see what I feel is a more balanced front line, but early foul trouble from Amir killed that chance, and he only ended up playing 20 minutes. Joey Dorsey had a career night, in his place, but the problem with Dorsey is that, while he&#8217;s an excellent rebounder, good shot blocker and pretty good low post scorer, he&#8217;s not really much of a defender. He&#8217;s not Bargnani-bad, but there&#8217;s certainly a reason he doesn&#8217;t play a lot of minutes. And this is a problem I&#8217;ve noticed long before the game against Chicago.</p>
<p>Now, both Davis and Amir can be very effective and efficient scorers, but score mostly off offensive rebounds and passes from teammates. Unfortunately against the best rebounding team in the NBA, there&#8217;s not going to be a lot of second chance points, and without a true PG, there aren&#8217;t going to be many good passes inside.</p>
<p>On the plus side, Davis got his first ever double double, but did learn that he has to get a lot stronger to be able to defend guys like Boozer in the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wearingfilm.com/picketfence/2010/12/things-we-learned-against-the-bulls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

